My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Telephone Survey
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Community/Regional Input
>
Telephone Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2006 10:15:05 AM
Creation date
9/19/2006 10:14:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e e <br /> <br />STRONGL Y SUPPORT .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 52% <br />SOMEWHAT SUPPORT ........................... 26% <br />SOMEWHAT OPPOSE ............................. 8% <br />STRONGL Y OPPOSE ............................. 10% <br />DON'TKNOWIREFUSED ............................4% <br /> <br />. , , <br /> <br />In fact, majority "strongly supported" a tax increase for this purpose. This proposal was the most <br />highly supported on the list. <br /> <br />Support was even higher among women and residents of Precinct Two. Opposition was <br />encountered most often among households containing children. <br /> <br />Park and recreation areas along the Mississippi River? <br /> <br />By a fifty-seven percent to thirty-three percent verdict, residents supported a tax increase for park <br />and recreation areas along the Mississippi River: <br /> <br />STRONGLY SUPPORT ............................. 25% <br />SOMEWHAT SUPPORT ............................ 32% <br />SOMEWHAT OPPOSE ............................. 13% <br />STRONGLY OPPOSE .............................. 20% <br />DON'TKNOWIREFUSED ........................... 10% <br /> <br />"Strong support" was only marginally higher than "strong opposition." <br /> <br />Support was strongest among 18-34 year olds. <br /> <br />Three park and recreational facilities proposals received very solid support, indicating an <br />excellent chance of passage in a referendum election: preservation of open spaces, a trail corridor <br />along the Mississippi River, and off-road trails along busy traffic corridors. <br /> <br />Funding Priorities <br /> <br />Respondents were asked: <br /> <br />In general, do you think a higher priority for funding <br />should be given to the development of parks and trails <br />OR the set-aside and preservation of open spaces? <br /> <br />By over two-to-one, residents thought "the set-aside and preservation of open spaces" should be <br />the higher priority: <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT OF PARKS........................ 26% <br /> <br />OPEN SPACE ..................................... 55% <br /> <br />SOMETHING ELSE ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% <br /> <br />NEITHER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% <br /> <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.