Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'- " <br /> <br />DON'T KN~IREFUSED ......... . . . .. . . . . . . ~ . . . . . 9% <br /> <br />While fifty-five percent opted for land preservation, twenty-six percent favored the development <br />of parks and trails. This result was consistent with the earlier questions about willingness to pay <br />increased taxes to fund park and recreation facilities projects. <br /> <br />"Development of parks" was the most frequent choice of households containing children, 18-34 <br />year olds, owners of $100,000-$125,000 homes, hous~holds connected to public sanitary sewer <br />and water services, and residents of Precinct lB. "Open space" was key for five-to-twenty year <br />residents, households not connected to public sanitary sewer and water services, and residents of <br />Precinct 1 A. <br /> <br />Summary and Conclusion <br /> <br />City residents possessed an unusually high level of information about the Ramsey Park System <br />and its facilities. However, rankings of the general system and specific components were well <br />below Metropolitan Area suburban norms. Similarly, residents were negative about the City's <br />ability to meet the recreational needs of adults and only tepidly positive about meeting the needs <br />of youth. Reflecting these shortcomings, almost one-half of the community left the city to <br />recreate elsewhere. <br /> <br />Substantial support existed for a bond referendum to augment the current park and recreation <br />system. The top priority was the setting-aside and preservation of open space. But, there was <br />also keen interest in the development of a comprehensive trails system - featuring a corridor <br />along the Mississippi River and off-road trails along busy traffic corridors. Clearly, residents <br />saw a need for further recreational development and were willing to sustain tax increases to fund <br />it. <br /> <br />32 <br />