Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... <br /> <br />L <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />December 15, 1997 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Fred Hoisington, HKGI <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />City of Ramsey Water Supply <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />Linda Waite Smith, Acting City Administrator <br />Jessie Hart, Finance Officer" ". <br />Mark Boos,Parks/Utilities Supervisor <br />Dean Kapler, Fire Chief/Director of Public Works <br /> <br />This memorandum is in response to the question as to whether the City of Ramsey can sustain a <br />water demand to accommodate the current rate of growth in its water utility. This question is <br />understandably raised by the fact that Ramsey has purchased water from the City of Anoka since <br />1995 to meet its peak demand days during the summer months. <br /> <br />The development of the City's water utility is guided by a Water Supply and Distribution Plan <br />which was prepared in November 1994. That study predicted the utilities growth rate through <br />year 2004 and recommended $4.87 million in supply and storage (wells and reservoirs) <br />improvements through that period. Specifically, the capital improvement plan called for an <br />interconnection with Anoka's system in 1994, a new Well No.3 in 1996, a new Well No.4 in <br />1998, and a new elevated tank in 1999. The City has completed the Anoka Interconnect, Well <br />No.3, and is currently drilling Well No.4, anticipating to be on-line by summer of 1998. The <br />City has met the infrastructure goals set forth in its plan. <br /> <br />The recommendation of the plan calling for an interconnection with the City of Anoka was made <br />for several reasons. First, it provided an emergency back-up for the City's system in the event of <br />an emergency which might effect either of the two existing wells that are serviced through a <br />single pump house. In addition, Anoka's system had excess well capacity, representing an <br />economic advantage to both the cities of Anoka and Ramsey. <br /> <br />It is common design practice for a water utility to provide a combination of water supply and <br />storage such that the utility can meet its peak day demand with its largest single source out of <br />service. This is known as firm well capacity. The table below illustrates the water utilities <br />supply capacity and the system's firm well capacity with each source out of service. <br /> <br />Water Utility Capacity <br /> <br />Source <br /> <br />Gallons <br />Per Minute <br /> <br />Million Gallons <br />Per Day <br /> <br />Well No.1 <br />Well No.2 <br />Well No.3 <br />Well No.4 <br />Anoka <br />TOTAL CAPACITY <br /> <br />900 <br />225 <br />1500 <br />1500 <br /> <br />1.3 <br />0.3 <br />2.2 <br />2.2 <br />1.0 <br />7.0 <br /> <br />Firm Well Capacity <br />Without Source <br /> <br />5.7 <br />6.7 <br />4.8 <br />4.8 <br />6.0 <br />