Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />planned for the riverfront area, there should be riverfront location policies that are consistent with <br />MNRRA. <br /> <br />Site Development Policies <br /> <br />Critical Area <br />. Ensuring natural state for bluffs and riverbanks should be added to site development policy #16 <br />throughout the corridor, not just protection of riverfront. Minimize site disturbance is partly addressed <br />in site development policy # 15, but must apply to entire corridor. Critical Area standards for <br />screening and retaining vegetation at existing development are addressed, although retaining <br />landscaping is not mentioned. <br /> <br />MNRRA <br />. The plan mentions setbacks from riverfront and bluff area, height restrictions, and preserving slopes <br />in excess of 12%. An additional 60' setback with minimal disturbance should be added unless no <br />buildings will exceed 30'. Dimensions for protection of the bluff impact area, shorelines and views <br />should be added to the plan or ordinances as indicated by NPS. <br /> <br />Open Space and Trails <br /> <br />Critical Area <br />. The open space inventory should include existing and potential public access points, and beaches and <br />undeveloped river frontage suitable for recreational purposes (could be dead-end road easements to <br />river or other). The plan discusses the potential route and some of the problems to locating it but does <br />not suggest solutions. Figure 23 is difficult to read. <br /> <br />. The plan identifies a potential open space area and includes implementation strategies for open space <br />acquisition. However, most of the river corridor rural open space district is being planned for mixed <br />residential. Under that scenario, open space should be assured by changing wording in land use <br />policy #5 from "Encourage" to "Ensure" and adding a statement to comply with Executive Order <br />dedication requirements. Policy that for planned developments and subdivisions, developers are <br />required to dedicate to the public, a reasonable portion of riverfront access land or other lands in <br />interest therein. If this is not physically possible or practical, contribute the equivalent in cashfor <br />acquisition of open space or other public services within the corridor. There is a greenway proposed, <br />but how will it be implemented? <br /> <br />MNRRA <br />. The plan supports increased open space. It would help the reader if a sub-section of open space <br />policies was included in order to clarify connections to the river and MNRRA policies. The use of <br />rail right of ways, enhancing safety along trails, and connecting neighborhoods and other areas in the <br />community are addressed in the Park & Recreation plan and could be cross referenced. <br /> <br />. There are no policies for major private developments to provide trails and river access or easements, <br />although new development will be done through the PUD process, which does allow the possibility <br />that trails and overlooks will be incorporated into projects at the time of development. A policy <br />should be added to preserve most land in natural state when developing parks, and stress passive <br />recreation and biological diversity, consistent with language in the Anoka County parks plan. <br />