Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Natural and Cultural Resource Management <br /> <br />Critical Area <br />. There are policies to minimize overland runoff and improve the quality of runoff, but the city has not <br />yet indicated that the minimum Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act requirements have been <br />met with adoption of interim standards. Also, measures to reduce runoff should be added to site <br />development policies (maybe tack onto site development policy #7). <br /> <br />MNRRA <br />. There are several natural resource policies but they should specifically address habitat and threatened <br />and endangered species protection and wetland restoration, and support an un-interrupted 40-foot <br />vegetated shoreline. Policies should be added to "increase and restore" habitat and biological <br />diversity in development projects, use native vegetation in restoring denuded areas, and consult with <br />DNR if a project could affect threatened or endangered species. <br /> <br />. Although there are general policies on pollution prevention and pollution control (policies 17, 18, and <br />19 on p.112), the policies do not target areas with sensitive resources in the corridor. Some specific <br />MNRRA guidelines are not addressed, such as reducing the use of salt on area roads and protecting <br />stream banks and water quality from negative impacts of recreational activities. <br /> <br />. The plan includes a policy to "promote the use and conservation of historic properties" and includes <br />interpretation activities. It does not commit to protecting cultural resources and archaeological sites <br />and consulting with Native American groups, when appropriate. Cultural resource protection in <br />development reviews should be included in the natural and cultural resource policy section. <br /> <br />Transportation and Public Utilities <br /> <br />Critical Area <br />. The plan includes some public utility policies and implementation steps to study Highway 10 and <br />bridge crossings to make sure there is compatibility with corridor purposes. Policies should be added <br />to address in the planning and design of public transportation facilities, consider provision of scenic <br />overlooks and pedestrian crossings/facilities and access to land between the river and transportation <br />facility and to ensure compatibility of transportation facilities and improvements with land and water <br />use in the corridor. <br /> <br />MNRRA <br />. The proposed Highway 10 study provides an opportunity to address architectural design standards for <br />the highway in the MNRRA corridor. Some of the language for pedestrian and bike access is in the <br />transportation section of the plan and could be emphasized for the river corridor. (See NPS comments <br />on underground utilities and increased connections to the river). <br /> <br />CIP and Implementation <br /> <br />There is a good implementation strategy, but add the five-year capital improvement program for all <br />projects in the corridor, and city support of any county initiative related to the river corridor. Please <br />add notification ofDNR in accordance with Critical Area and Wild & Scenic River requirements. <br />