Laserfiche WebLink
-348 <br />Mr. Winslow Holesek questioned why this parcel was not rezoned to residential on May 1, 2003 <br />when the other land in this area was rezoned from B -2 to residential under the protests of the <br />residents. <br />Chairperson Nixt replied he would need to review the minutes of the meeting. He suspects after <br />the Comprehensive Plan was adopted there were a number of individuals in the City who either <br />did not pay attention or realized the zoning assigned to their property in the Comprehensive Plan <br />process was not to their satisfaction. <br />t t..ted this si a 4 <br />bjectio <br />' s is a <br />it will d � �r> <br />ith the City. <br />1. He understands <br />be an issue whethe <br />r . concern if t� <br />e ®�r• blems� <br />zoning c <br />Mr. Holesek stated their zoning was not in compliance wi <br />City changed the Comprehensive Plan. They r <br />Comprehensive Plan to fit their zoning, and inst <br />the City should treat like property like. <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the situation was tha <br />and was changed back to residential. This particu <br />was not changed from B -2 to residential, which wa <br />He believes the Commission felt there was no way to <br />bowling alley. <br />Mr. Holesek questioned what the Comm <br />Chairperson Nixt replied medium dens <br />is not inclined to disagree with. °..: equ <br />Associate Planner Dalnes re <br />repair and gas stations. <br />Chairperson <br />surround <br />com <br />co <br />wil <br />the wes <br />Planning Commission /September 7, 2006 <br />Page 7 of 22 <br />hensive Plan because the <br />amendment to change the <br />the opposite. He stated <br />had mistake +ned as B -2, <br />roperty bein_ + scussed tonight <br />ximity of the bowling alley. <br />ily residence next to a <br />lifter with this parcel. <br />tified as appropriate, which he <br />ormation on eligible B -2 uses. <br />office use and could also include auto <br />1s with the landowner's right to use his property and the <br />e the zoning given that the site is challenged for <br />r ed commercial site, and if it remains zoned as <br />vacant, v= h he has a difficult time with. The applicant has <br />ensity is appropriate as a transition between commercial and <br />erns, but many of the issues tonight are related to traffic, <br />is medium density, single family or commercial. The traffic <br />is commercial. The concern regarding the townhome units to <br />lic safety issue that needs to be addressed in the City. <br />Mr. Holesek st• ®- as a gas station would require a special permit. He feels it is very <br />unfair treatment to e person one way and another person another way on the same type of <br />zoning. He does not % now what he would want for transitioning, but he would not want a <br />multiplex next to him. He has learned that it does not make much difference what the landowner <br />thinks in this City, because the City does what it wants anyway. <br />