Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Blakemore questioned how the residents of the area have been incorporated into working <br />with the City along with the owner of the property. <br />Chairperson Nixt replied there have been public hearings held regarding this development. <br />Mr. Blakemore stated the developer must have side barred this. He was at the last meeting this <br />was discussed and it was stated after the meeting by a commissioner that there would have to be <br />a good reason to rezone this land from commercial to residential. <br />Chairperson Nixt explained the applicant has worked get a land use request <br />reviewed and up for approval and consideration. doe to be made to appear that <br />the City has modified their policies or procedu .- cco =�q� • ° + applicant, which is not <br />the case to his knowledge. <br />Mr. Blakemore stated the Commission informe <br />residents of the area do not like what has been pr <br />applicant has reworked the plan into three differen <br />of the residents in the process. <br />icant at the _ ng that the <br />at it shoul• :reworked. The <br />ere was no inclusion of any <br />Chairperson Nixt explained the process � the reside w ave more interest there <br />are established office hours to meet wi <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the minut <br />statement that for him to say yes .t this, <br />not just be for monetary gain. <br />rest of the Commission. In ad <br />in that this is a challen <br />challenged enough that the <br />any other w d -velop the <br />colleagu. - ° 's <br />use of <br />Hillyard, 13711 <br />to this property. H <br />family zoning, <br />was last discussed reflect his <br />e a good reason for it, and it could <br />tatement al position, not the position of the <br />he thinks. a Nixt has stated the issue fairly well, <br />The questio e Commission is whether the site is <br />on is willing to change the zoning because they cannot see <br />od people will differ on that issue, and some of his <br />nothi _ can be done with this site, and that this is the best <br />18 Dolomite Street NW, stated his property is immediately <br />tands this lot is large enough to sustain three residential units <br />ould be okay with that. <br />Mr. Ler ° 6774 1 a - enue NW, stated there have been quite a few problems in their <br />neighborho o velopment put in to the northwest of them. Just the other day he <br />had someone c`" sidewalk in broad daylight, slice his garden hose and run. The day <br />before yesterday some ame up and rang his doorbell, but by the time he got there they were <br />gone. This is a proble t at is happening that they never had before. He is in favor of a business <br />going here, and does not agree that a business will not work there. <br />Ms. Defore, 6166 Rivlyn Street NW, stated she has lived in this neighborhood for 18 years. They <br />have had all kinds of trouble with the townhomes, and she does not want any more multifamily <br />Planning Commission /September 7, 2006 <br />Page 8 of 22 <br />—349— <br />