My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are a variety of considerations that must be accounted for in a public art program.These <br /> include artist and site selection for public art projects, maintenance,funding, staffing, administration, <br /> and other elements.This analysis will review the master plans of cities in three population categories, <br /> weighted based on the distribution of public art programs by population range, and survey literature <br /> and statistical information on public art. From this methodology,this report will outline the typical <br /> creation process for a public art master plan, components found in a public art master plan, and the <br /> practical implications for cities looking to undertake this process. <br /> Literature Review <br /> Understanding the benefits of public art is a key consideration in setting the goals for a public <br /> art master plan. Civic dialogue, arts& culture:Findings from Animating Democracy reports findings <br /> about 36 art projects in the United States with the goal of promoting civic dialogue through the arts. <br /> While the projects are not limited to those of traditional public art, the discussion from the cases <br /> presented provides a critical link between what are perceived as two very different worlds, <br /> governmental policy and the arts.The authors present practical evidence that the arts can be used to <br /> illuminate public issues and bring about dialogue, supporting governmental efforts at community and <br /> consensus building. One particularly relevant example to this analysis is the Social Public Art Resource <br /> Center in Los Angeles.This ongoing project brought together artists, scholars, students, and local <br /> residents to design and create a public mural that illuminates the often forgotten history of minority <br /> communities. Its goal is to use art to tackle the sensitive subjects of demographic shifts and race <br /> relations that are prevalent in Los Angeles. Feedback was sought via the internet and traditional public <br /> forums to help decide what should be depicted in the mural. Other projects used similar artistic <br /> approaches to tackle issues such as the holocaust, human genomics, and poverty(Korza, Bacon, &Assaf, <br /> 2005).The direct visualization of these issues inspired controversy and media attention, which brought <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.