My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
harmful impacts."This provides evidence that strategic planning in general is perceived as effective in <br /> municipal government. <br /> Additionally,the review of the plans shows that cities have a number of goals for their public art <br /> master plans.These are generally related to open space or parks planning, economic development, <br /> cultural tourism, and quality of life.There is typically some acknowledgment that the municipal <br /> government recognizes the benefit of public art to the community either economically or culturally as <br /> well. <br /> Plan Development Process <br /> The use of consultants was seen in nine of ten plans with regard to the process of creation.The <br /> survey of public art programs in fiscal year 2001 also found that 69%of programs had employed <br /> consultants at one time.The most common use of consultants was for master planning (Americans for <br /> the Arts, 2003). In addition, all ten plans employed either an existing commission or task force on the <br /> arts, made of community volunteers, or a newly created commission on public art to inspire community <br /> involvement and create a collaborative process. <br /> While the process of plan creation is not necessarily part of the public art master plan itself,the <br /> importance placed on inclusion and community involvement is an important aspect of this process.This <br /> is supported in the examples provided in Civic Dialogue:Arts and Culture(Korza, Bacon, &Assaf, 2005), <br /> as well as in the recommendations provided by Marc Pally in his article for the NEA. Pally suggested a <br /> diverse group of seven to nine individuals be employed for the plan development process (Pally, n.d.). <br /> Additionally, McCarthy's (2010) article suggests that broad local collaboration can influence the growth <br /> arts and culture in a community.The public commissions charged with creating the plans had varying <br /> compositions, but typically included local arts community groups, political leaders, city staff, artists, <br /> engineers, and design professionals.The interaction of experts in the field and community leaders in a <br /> local area is believed to be important when developing a plan,this is evidenced by the unanimous <br /> 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.