My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
belonging to the public, it thus must represent the public's interest. Reinforcing this idea, Fleming and <br /> Goldman (2005) summarize the outcomes of two federal public art programs stating"The National <br /> Endowment for the Arts'Art in Public Places Program collapsed because it remained stubbornly out of <br /> touch with this reality.The General Services Administration's Art in Architecture Program, on the other <br /> hand, has thrived under a new model that recognizes the difference between gallery art and public art, <br /> and that takes account of the sensibilities of the people who will have to see the artwork every day." <br /> The common practice for this component is to have a public art review authority which represents <br /> broad community interests and technical expertise related to the creation of public art.This body is <br /> typically responsible for the approval of public art projects, artist selection, and the selection of sites for <br /> public art. <br /> Funding <br /> Funding is an important component of any public program and is recommended to be addressed <br /> in the master plan. Seven of ten public art programs reviewed are funded by a percent-for-art program <br /> that dedicates somewhere between one-half to two percent of the value of capital construction <br /> projects, and private developments in some instances, over a certain dollar amount to public art. This <br /> money is typically placed in a public art fund and covers administration, acquisition and construction, as <br /> well as maintenance, insurance, and other costs. Percent-for-art programs often provide that a <br /> developer may contribute to a public art fund, in lieu of actually commissioning public art.The survey of <br /> public art programs found that programs housed in government agencies received 91%of their funding <br /> from government sources, with 58% receiving their funding from a dedicated percent-for-art revenue <br /> source, at an average budget in fiscal year 2001 of$911,594 (Americans for the Arts, 2003). In many <br /> cases,this fund is designed to be a public and private partnership to encourage private firms to donate <br /> to public art initiatives. This fund was also commonly used to provide grant funding for public art <br /> projects. The common practice for this component is the establishment of a percent-for-art program, <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.