My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the creation of a public art fund, and public/private partnerships that leverage public money with <br /> private funds.Additional methods of raising private funds through required developer contributions or a <br /> nonprofit fundraising body have also been employed by local governments.These options may be more <br /> suitable for locations where it is not feasible for public funds to be allocated to public art. <br /> Site Selection <br /> Site selection is recommended to be part of any public art master plan and it was included in all <br /> ten plans reviewed. From reviewing the plans,two approaches are generally taken for site selection. <br /> First, broad community identification can be done where neighborhoods and geographic regions that <br /> may be well-suited for public art are identified. For example, a focus may be put on public art in a <br /> downtown area.This can, and was in many master plans, refined further with the second method of <br /> identifying sites, which is specifying individual public sites. Following the previous example,this would <br /> identify a specific park or public site in the downtown area.These specific sites could be public parks, as <br /> used in the example, or other civic gathering places and publically accessible areas, such as pavilions, <br /> pedestrian malls, or areas adjacent to public buildings. Cartiere (2009) discusses the inclusion of public <br /> art in light-rail transit systems sites, concluding"utilizing place-specificity serves as a means to highlight, <br /> preserve and present the unique social aspects of a specific location — the history, memories, stories, <br /> uses, people, nature — which might otherwise have been displaced by transit development, urban <br /> sprawl or general neglect."The common practice for this component is to give the responsibility of site <br /> identification to the public art review authority. This authority was found to be charged with evaluating <br /> sites and creating priorities based on criteria including: public access, visibility, ability to create a sense <br /> of community, historical significance, public safety, engineering concerns, and other factors that may be <br /> locally relevant. <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.