My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
usually the organization that is charged with managing the program privately when contracting is <br /> preferred. <br /> The survey of public art programs found that 81%of public art programs were housed within a <br /> government agency in fiscal year 2001.The survey also found the average number of employees <br /> dedicated to staffing a government public art program was two, with each person managing an average <br /> of 9.8 projects. (Americans for the Arts, 2003)The resources government offers and their authority over <br /> public space seems to make government administration of public art programs more popular.This is <br /> evidenced by the fact that the majority of public art programs that were surveyed in fiscal year 2001 <br /> were housed in government.Additionally, only one of ten plans opted to contract administration of the <br /> plan to a private, nonprofit organization (City of Chesterfield, 2009).The common practice for this <br /> component is to locate the public art program within the government and to provide adequate staffing <br /> to manage the number of projects that are anticipated based on the funding mechanism utilized for <br /> public art.Additional consideration was given to maintenance, documentation, and educational <br /> programming when setting the staffing level. <br /> Documentation of Public Art <br /> Documentation is also a core component of public art master planning.The first step in this <br /> process is the assessment and documentation of existing public art, essentially creating an inventory of <br /> public art projects. Documentation is included of nine of ten public art plans reviewed.This is argued to <br /> be linked to both maintenance and education. Providing documentation helps citizens, educators, and <br /> students know what public art is available in the community, and also helps administrators track <br /> projects and funding needs over time. The most common practice is to delegate documentation to <br /> permanent or contracted staff. <br /> 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.