Laserfiche WebLink
Research consisted of local and regional published material (e.g., reports, ordinances, <br /> policies, pamphlets, and online material) to gain general knowledge of the community's public <br /> art projects, determine the level of collaboration, community engagement, and the relative <br /> support or opposition to specific community art projects. <br /> Interviews are the primary source of data for this research. Initial one-on-one interview <br /> were conducted with several key people in each of the three communities. The city manager, <br /> the mayor, and a community art professional involved with public art were interviewed for the <br /> case study. Additional interviews were conducted with additional civic stakeholders, who were <br /> identified as collaborators on public art projects through interviews or archival research. <br /> Interviews covered the following topics: how the community defines public art, the <br /> community's history with public art, the community member's perception of public art, the role <br /> of public art in community place-making, the justification for public art, the process of decision- <br /> making regarding public art, the decision-makers involved in the process, collaboration between <br /> decision-makers and organizations, and the role of the public administrator in these relationships. <br /> All of the interviewees were initially contacted by telephone or email to explain the study <br /> and to solicit and schedule a subsequent interview. Interviews were scheduled for sixty minutes <br /> at the person's place of employment or another convenient location for the interviewee. Upon <br /> scheduling an interview, a follow-up letter was sent to confirm the appointment, to explain the <br /> purpose of the study, the importance of their participation, the value added by their participation, <br /> and requesting permission for the interview (Appendix A). Each participant was assured that <br /> confidentiality would be strictly observed with respect to the answers provided during the <br /> interview. The letter also explained that the interviews would be audio recorded with the <br /> permission of the interviewee. I also took field notes during the interview. Post-interview <br /> 77 <br />