Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 5 <br /> Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> 5.1 Conclusions <br /> The hypothesis of this research study was that the role of the public administrator is <br /> critical in fostering and maintaining the cross-sector relationships that are instrumental in the <br /> implementation of public art in a small city. This research used a qualitative case study design to <br /> contrast and compare the activity and roles of the public administrator in relation to public art <br /> initiatives in each of the three sub j ect cities. The following key findings were developed from <br /> the interviews conducted as part of this study. <br /> Research Question I <br /> Does the public administrator's role in managing cross-sector collaborations lead to a <br /> successful public art project? <br /> e <br /> This research indicates that the public administrator's role in managing cross-sector <br /> collaborations can contribute to a successful public art project. The public administrator plays <br /> multiple roles concerning public art including fulfilling interpersonal, informational, and <br /> decisional roles. The city manager, and administrative staff, often play a pivotal role between <br /> the art commissioning group, the city council, and the public. All three subject communities had <br /> developed public art policies and had incorporated public art into the strategic vision for the <br /> community. The city manager is the individual responsible for taking the high level policy <br /> direction from the city council and implementing those policies on a day-to-day basis. The <br /> research showed that an inclusive upfront collaborative process can build a common expectation <br /> among the elected official, the artists, and the public about the value of art in the community and <br /> 142 <br />