My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/09/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 1:53:42 PM
Creation date
1/17/2025 10:52:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/09/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
496
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
create a project that "fits." The city manager, or the delegated staff, is responsible for these <br /> efforts. <br /> Research Ouestion 2 <br /> Did the public art project achieve its desired goals such as developing a sense of place, a <br /> sense of identity, and a sense of community within the selected study communities? <br /> e e e e e <br /> All community respondents indicated that public art is an important part of shaping and <br /> defining the identity of the community, and that each city had accomplished these objectives to <br /> some degree. Terms such as community image, building the city's brand, sense ofplace, and <br /> sense of community were used by respondents in each community as one of the primary benefits <br /> of public art. The unique sculptures that each community has developed, by definition, make <br /> each city unique in their own right. All cities made efforts to capture the values, history and <br /> culture of the local community as part of their local objectives. <br /> Research Question 3 <br /> To what extent does active cross-sector collaboration and citizen engagement, facilitated <br /> by city officials, add to or detract from the perceived success of a public art initiative? <br /> This research indicates that the process of implementing projects is an important factor. <br /> Given the choice of piece, process, or site, as the most important component of a project, the <br /> majority of respondents choose the process as the primary factor in a projects success, or lack <br /> thereof. That is, successful projects were deemed successful due to a good process and <br /> unsuccessful projects were deemed unsuccessful due to a poor process. A "good"process was <br /> one that included upfront planning and citizen engagement to create a project that fit with the <br /> community. These successful projects included various forms of public participation such as <br /> public voting for the best sculptures, or organized city events to promote new public art. In <br /> 143 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.