Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there seems to a be a policy issue with the Council <br /> approving a Comprehensive Plan amendment on Tuesday night and then holding a public hearing <br /> for additional Comprehensive Plan amendments on a Thursday night. He stated that it seems that <br /> the Comprehensive Plan process has become a weekly process for the City. He quested when it <br /> had become an unspoken policy to change the Comprehensive Plan process from being a long <br /> range-planning tool to a"Plan of the week". <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that the City has been in the process of attempting to approve <br /> the Comprehensive Plan for some time and in December a Plan was adopted, but there had also <br /> been considerable discussion regarding land use changes that were not addressed as of yet. He <br /> explained that anytime a developer or a property owner requests and land use change the City has <br /> to act on those requests. <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that what he was suggesting is that there should be some sense <br /> that when the Comprehensive Plan is approved land use change requests should have to wait until <br /> the next comprehensive plan is approved. Now the City is in a situation where they sent an <br /> amendment to the Met Council on Tuesday and now they were handling 14 more amendments <br /> only two nights later. He did not think that was an organized way to handle the situation and <br /> questioned how residents can keep informed if they are always changing things. <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that he agreed that it was not the typical way of handling <br /> things, but explained that because of the circumstances they have found themselves in this <br /> situation. Many of the requests before them had to be considered as official requests. <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen questioned if the City ever said no to any of the requests. <br /> Chairperson Nixt stated that the Comprehensive Plan process has been going on since 1997 and <br /> they have taken the time to evaluate land uses during that time, but the City had been, until <br /> recently, been having to comply with the 1993 Comprehensive Plan which was the reason for <br /> many of the amendments. The particular Comprehensive Plan they are looking to amend is the <br /> Plan approved December 18, 2002 in which the City received approval of from the Met Council. <br /> Over the several months that that Plan was being discussed the City received several requests <br /> regarding land use and that is what they are acting on. <br /> Commissioner Johnson noted that they were not going to be making any decisions regarding the <br /> amendments during this meeting and were there to take public comments and requested that they <br /> proceed with that. <br /> Chairperson Nixt verified that the meeting was a properly notified public hearing. <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon replied that that was correct. <br /> Citizen Input <br /> Planning Commission Joint Meeting/January 24, 2002 <br /> Page 3 of 14 <br />