Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />the local tree inspector could enforce state st~tute. SinGe ~hen, t~e <br />State concluded that they would not require tre~ inspectors tc;> enfor~e <br />their State statutes and it is unclear whether! a city canjcontinue FO <br />enforce the State ordinance or if cities must hare the~rowl1 ordinanc~. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Couhcilmember ~orteberg to <br />table adopting the diseased tree control ordinahce anp direct; the Ci~y <br />Attorney to research the State's position on :diseased t(ee contr91 <br />enforcement. Further, to request that Tree In~pecto~ Bru~e Bacon pe <br />present during the next City Council discussion pf the propqsed disea~e <br />control ordinance. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Counqilmembers Sotteberg, cqx, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case ~:lr2: ~opt ordiIl~c;:e ~nqin9 ~tioQ. 1~0.0~ Of~_Rams~Y City <br />coq~.~ard1l19.far~ DedicatiQn ~i~ements: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley explained that the primary change irelated to thepropos~d <br />amendment is that the City would be able to r~ceive' landfqash orl a <br />combination of land and cash for park dedicatiop purposes .nd' the pa!rk <br />dedication would be required at platting ratherl than when ~he building <br />permit is issued. . <br /> <br />councilnember Cox stated that the proposed amen~ent to par* dedication <br />requiranents should be discussed at the joint meeting between ~ity Council <br />and the Park and Recreation Commission. ' . <br /> <br />Mr. Otto noted that several preliminat'Y plat apprQvals are penping Counc:il <br />action on the proposed ordinance. . <br /> <br />Mr. Gerald Zimmerman was present and stated t~at Pl~nnin9l and zoni~g <br />supports the proposed amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich noted that the even though the pioposed amepdIIlent do~s <br />increase the amount of cash and/or land the City can frec::eive,] Ramsey's <br />requirements are still lCMer than what other citits are .requir~ng:. · i' <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. - ,- , <br /> <br />Motion by councilmember Cox and seconded by COuncilmembeir Pearbonj to tab,le,. <br />adoption of the proposed amendment to the Park O,edica~ioh Opdipance!~n<3 <br />that discussion of same be included on the agenqa for Ithe j~intmeetilng; <br />with Park and Recreation Camnission. .".' <br /> <br />. ' <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor ReiJnann, Coun~ilmemberssdrteberg, cqx, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Council recessed at 9: 00 p.m. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann called the meeting back to order at! 9:18 p.m. <br /> <br />Case #13: CQJls~der Amendment '1'0 ,The City' ~ . Gonpr~h~~ ~~ PlaI'lj: <br />City Council/May 24, 198~ . . <br /> <br />Page 11 of 18 <br /> <br />