Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />',! <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2001 Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />6. Municipal sewer s'mces . <br /> <br />In .1985 municipal sewer aJ).d water;'w7re.madeavailable to a small area in <br />so~theast Ramsey. Th~gev,lopmentp~ttel1D began;to change from large lot <br />development in the 11Ui1ar,*Sf of the community to the more land use efficient <br />smaller lots (1/4 aCnl tot8) ""ithin the IiewMetropolitan Urban Services Area <br />(MUSA). Developmenj foxJitoriumsmid zoning codes were' used to control <br />grG>wth by encouragitfg .... d~veloPl11ent.~tl1in ; the MUSA and discouraging <br />development outside t~)AQSA. Highqual!ty industry, which was minimal in <br />the area, began to deveIt>ri in'~seY!ecaus~the services were now available to <br />meet their operating nqeqs.Major business and industrial parks were soon to <br />follow adding emplo~t olWortunities and industrial tax base. <br /> <br />In . 1989 the City ameJj.d~d its Compr,eh,ensive Plan designating three districts <br />outside of the MUS^, .~~ Urban Reserve, the Rural Transition, and the Rural <br />Service Area. In Januar!dfl~90 theCity,im:plemented a regional growth tool for <br />thl:fse three areas, "4 in t4Cl"~ensityrequirements. The intentions. of this zoning <br />requirement were to '.; ei\co~ge growthwit)l.in the MUSA and preserve large <br />tracts of land (at least ~O~crfs') outside tl1e MuSA for future orderly expansion <br />anqI thus accommodat~ tegional growth wJ~hin. the capacity of the regional <br />sy~tem (roads and sewers).; Speculatien has it that this policy has caused <br />developers to look bey~qI R$unsey tocommlUlities like Elk River, Big Lake, or <br />Bupls Township were jreate1' densities are ltllowedand land is more affordable <br />(this phenomenon is cOTrl'IoJ.1lY referred to "leap-frog development"). In the early <br />19S>O's three and four l.vel splits and modified two'story homes' emerged as the <br />po:pular housing style. ;~sey's location in the northern suburbs continues to <br />make these homes afforiiable.to two income earning households. <br /> <br />7. Ramsey's second gtowt.spurt <br /> <br />In the early stages ofth~ 1999's, Ramsey saw a similar growth spurt to the one it <br />had experienced in the eafly i~970's. A r,ecen-t expansion of the MUSA line has <br />allowed more land to open ~pto residential subdivisions and the availability of <br />platted lots combined With lo~Tc interest ratestesulted in Ramsey's second major <br />growth spurt. Havin~ wit~essed the symptoms of this growth before, the <br />community began takiJtg 'steps to control this rapid sprawl. Development has <br />slowed during the last l\alf o~ 1997 due to the passing of various amendments to <br />the City Charter and .tJ1e. . placement . ofa moratoriUm. on . residential housing <br />developments in the City, 1\s the remaining platted lots begin to dwindle and <br />land development is b(Jcomihgmoredifficult, growth is dramatically slowing <br />once again. <br /> <br />8. Historical Structu~es <br /> <br />Only a few of the first ,otlses ~d struct1.lr'esbuilt in Ramsey remain today. The <br />most notable structure jof historic signifiCance is identified on the National <br />Register of Historic Pla~es, ~eRamsey l'own'Hall, which is located on the west <br />side of Highway 47 j~~t.nor1hiof its intersection with County Road 116. This <br />structure was built d~ ,thel19th century; an:q originally used as a schoolhouse. <br />A significant effort has ~een :wade to preserve and maintain this building, which <br />currently sits vacant W'a~ittg f4>r a user. <br /> <br />2001 Ramsey Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />Page IlI-4 <br />