Agenda - Council - 10/24/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Chairperson Nixt indicated this should not derail them from evaluating the site. Under code it is required to have a main site and an alternate site for the septic system. If a traditional perking system cannot be utilized there are other options that would increase the cost. The development will not be given the go ahead until the City is convinced the on -site system that will serve this area will be acceptable for the proposed use with an alternate. Chairperson Nixt stated the other concern is the access to the building through the private interior road, which has not been changed from the 24-foot width. . The t with parking standards for private roads with parking on one side are 28 on both sides. Mr. Dale Campbell, John Oliver Engineering Firm, stated they reviewed this loaded base s from. for 15 units with the center drive for these buildings to back onto and The way he understands this site, there will probably very seldom ever be a semi truck in this-drive thi&-driVF For theTife protection design of °thr 4n& the bucks toy be able ten btiate the w exterior perimeter of this site, 26 feet is the amount of land left over for the road. He clarified the width of the road is 26 feet, not 24 feet. There would be enough room to park. one semi, possibly ossibl two The parking on the site would likely be more delivery type; of parkin Chairperson r d He expressed concern that f 25 f t d road is less than standard private street one Nixt co 0o wi � . � ., the �a� width is � with on ones e the number of units that will be on the site It is7not known how many trucks there v4ll be. Ii need -toLbe -anticipated. that the use. will be .moderate to heavy, and,t eroad desrgn is a little short on that use. Comm past Van Scoy commented the PUD's the Commission has reviewed in the ast have had°&publicroad= through: the. P `UD - with <pri ate�:r'oads-wff'oftheypublic -m Associate Planner Dalnes explained a public road through the middle of this site would cul -de -sac at a dead end. It made more sense to have a narrower kind of through street for fire, as the public street would not serve any public purpose. This development is being done as a PUD because it is a single development, although 156 Avenue does run through the development. Commissioner Trites Rolle asked if the center drive aisle is intended to be one way. Mr. Walz responded in the affirmative. He indicated there will to have 111 be additional ton pull up space in back of units 16, 5, 12 and 9 that will be paved. If there is a behind lengthwise it will still leave enough room to get off the main road and have trucks go through. the Chairperson Nixt inquired about the configuration that deliveries will occur. He a s k ed rear elevation is laid out and how it is anticipated