Laserfiche WebLink
<br />submittal of airport documents. (Refer to resolution file for Resolution <br />#88-131) . <br /> <br />/-') <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg. <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cox. <br /> <br />Case #3: Reauest For Conditional Use Permit To Operate A Vehicle Sales <br />Loti Case Of Mr. Ro~er Hurd: <br /> <br />Ms. Norris noted that Council adopted findings of fact regarding Mr. Hurd's <br />request on June 28; since then, Mr. Hurd has submitted a more detailed site <br />plan. The County has reviewed the site plan and suggested that Mr. Hurd <br />provide an additional 27 feet of right-of-way along Ramsey Blvd. for future <br />upgrading. Planning and Zoning has recommended denial of the request based <br />on traffic hazards in the area and ultimate plans for that area based on <br />the Hwy. :/110 Study. <br /> <br />Motion by Ceuncilmember Pearson and sec ended by Counci lmember DeLuca to <br />approve Mr. Roger Hurd's request for a conditional use permit contingent <br />upon providing the additional 27 feet of right-of-way along Ramsey Blvd. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #4: Request For Metes And Bounds Subdivision: Case Of Tiller <br />Corporat ion: <br /> <br />Ms. Norris stated that Tiller Corporation is requesting a metes and bounds <br />subdivision to acquire property for a street roadway to their asphalt plant <br />site; Planning and Zoning recommended approval of the request. <br /> <br />, <br />i <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember DeLuca and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />approve Tiller Corporation's request for a metes and bounds subdivision. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cox. <br /> <br />Case #5: Request For Metes And Bounds Subdivision And Request For <br />Rezonin~ From Residential To B-1 Business; Case Of Mr. Dennis <br />Holmquist: <br /> <br />Ms. Norris stated that Mr. Holmquist is requesting subdivision of a <br />property at 6326 Hwy. :/110 and rez oning of the then northern parcel from <br />Residential to B-1 Business. Planning and Zoning recommended denial of the <br />request for a subdivision as it would create two substandards lots and <br />denial of the request for rezoning because the City would not have adequate <br />control over property. use. <br /> <br />Jim Noran - Attorney for Dennis Holmquist - Stated that there was a taking <br />of the northerly 50 feet of Mr. Holmquist's property for utility and street <br />improvements and in those negotiations, Mr. Holmquist was led to believe <br />that he would release the 50 feet for $3800 and consideration of rezoning <br />for small business purposes. The taking of the 50 feet seriously <br />City Council/July 26, 1988 <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />If <br />