Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REVIEW SUMMARYOF' ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION REGARDINS PROPOs..l\L OF WASTE <br />MANAGEMENT Of MINNEroJ.'A, IOC.: <br /> <br />Mr . Don otter and Mr. Terry Miller of Waste Nanagement of Minnesota, Inc. <br />were present. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartiey presented and reviewed a summary of issues and outline for <br />discussion Waste Management of Hinnesota, Inc. I s proposal for development <br />of a recreational facility at the existing landfill site. (See Attachment <br />I to these minutes.) Mr. Hartley noted that the out 1 ine does not <br />necessarily represent what will be agreed to by Ramsey or Waste Management. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilrnernber Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson <br />directing City Staff to continue discussions and negotiations for an <br />agreement between the City of Ramsey and Waste Management of Minnesota, <br />Inc. for the development of a recreational facility which shall be <br />presented to City Council for consideration at it I S next meeting. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: ~1r. Hartley asked Mr. Otter if Waste Management is <br />willing to continue negotiations. Mr. Otter replied that Waste Management <br />is willing to continue to negotiations. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilnembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Easement Acquisition Regardina Sewer ~~d Water Project For <br />Pro~rtiesSouth Of U.S. H;gh~:v #10: <br /> <br />Mr. Gooo.rich stated that the Holasek' s have submitted amendments to the <br />easement agreements verbally agreed to in December, 1987. The cost to the <br />City for those additional items would be at least $33,550.00; this amounts <br />to a total benefit of $86,110.00 to the Holaseks, which is $29,680.00 over <br />the estimated appraised value of the property. <br /> <br />t>lotion by Councilrrernber DeLuca and seconded by Councilmernber Cox to adopt <br />ReSOlution #88-14 to offer property owners the appraised cash value or <br />services listed in the draft purchase agreement reviewed December 22, 1987 <br />for easements south of u.s. Hwy. #10 and to authorize staff to proceed with <br />the condemnation process in the event the offer is rejected. (Please refer <br />to resolution file for Resolution #88~14). <br /> <br />Further Discussion: CouncilIrernber Cox noted that there is also the option <br />to align the services in the Hwy. #10 right-.of-way. Councilmember DeLuca <br />noted that even with the Hwy. #10 alignment, there 'would be acquisition of <br />property necessary and that could be another long involved process. Mr. <br />Gooo.rich confirmed that some of the same property o..mers would have to be <br />dealt with, but oP~y for temporary construction easements. <br /> <br />ttlOtioncarried. Voting Yes: Hayor Reimann, Councilrnembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />City CounCil/February 9, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />