Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'.: J :~:r.;~~~};~ ..:\ :.)~'(:)~~'::,. . . <br /> <br />SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPAlUSON OF <br />EARC VALUE PER PUPIL UNrr. <br /> <br />Ci ty Council <br />January 19, 1988 <br />Attachment II <br /> <br />The valuation behind each pupil unit is an indicator of the District's ability to raise <br />significant revenue through referendums. <br /> <br />Districts with Enrollments <br />of 8,000 or More <br /> <br />DISTRICT <br /> <br />Duluth <br />Anoka-Hennepin <br />South Washington <br />Osseo ' <br />Rosemotmt <br />St. Cloud <br />Burnsville <br />Robbinsdale <br />Rochester <br />North St. Paul <br />Motmds View <br />St. Paul <br />Bloom ington <br />Minneapolis <br /> <br />HARC VALUE PER PUPIL UNIT <br /> <br />$20,264 <br />21,92"9, <br />27,'112 <br />29,069 <br />31,178 <br />36,664 <br />42,496 <br />4.5,833 <br />46,046 <br />46,465 <br />48,276 <br />55,413 <br />62,499 <br />73,706 <br /> <br />. Anoka-Hennepin must levy twice as many mms as Robbinsdale and nearly three times as <br />many mills as Bloomington to raise an equal number of dollars per pupil \mit. <br /> <br />. ~~~~ <br />1985-86 Cost Comparisons - General Fund 1\ ~~t I <br />Category ...JL/ ~ $/P.U. <br /> <br />Adminis tr ation <br />District Support <br />Regular Instruction <br />Vocational Education <br />Exceptional Education <br />Instructional Support <br />Pupil Support <br />Operation and Maintenance <br />Fixed Costs <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />.Source - 1985-86 School District Profiles <br /> <br />5.2 <br />3.1 <br />49.1 <br />3.0 <br />11.5 <br />5.5 <br />3.6 <br />9.3 <br />9.7 <br />100.0% <br /> <br />$129 <br />77 <br />1,222 <br />76 <br />287 <br />137 <br />89 <br />231 <br />241 <br />- <br /> <br />$2,489 <br /> <br />Large School Average <br /> <br />$163 <br />91 <br />1,351 <br />65 <br />374 <br />133 <br />95 <br />295 <br />225 <br />$2,792 <br />