Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to operate a print shop in their garage at 7351 lSlst Lane for one year. <br />The Brozak I s have stated there will be no customers coming to the home. <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the request. <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann suggested requiring a bond or letter of credit to def ray the <br />legal costs incurred by the City if the Brozak's refuse to cease the <br />operation in one year. <br /> <br />COuncil consensus was that requiring a bond should first be researched and <br />then established asa general policy. <br /> <br />Motion by COuncilmember Sorteberg and seconded by COunci1member DeLuca to <br />adopt Findings of Fact 0197, amended as fo11CMs, relating to Mark and LuAnn <br />Brozak's request for a conditional use permit: (Please refer to findings <br />of fact file for Findings of Fact 0197). <br /> <br />Item *8 - Change to read as follCMs: 'That the Appl icant has stated <br />that the print shop would be a pick-up and delivery business; the <br />majority of the business would be done over the telephone. There <br />would be no drop-in bUBiness. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: <br />DP.T.,1.lcaand Pearson. Voting No: <br /> <br />Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, <br />None. Absent: Councilrnembe r Cox. <br /> <br />!'1otion by COuncilrnember Sorteberg and seconded by COuncilmember Pearson to <br />apprOV'e Mark and LuAnn Brozak's request for a conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: LuAnn Brozak was present and stated she agrees with <br />the terms in the conditional use permit and guaranteed she will not operate <br />the b'..lSiness for more than one year at her horne. Council amended Item #1 <br />of the conditional use permit to indicate an expiration date of March 22, <br />1989. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmernbers Sorteberg, DeLuca and Pearson. <br />Voting No: Payor Reimann. Absent: Councilrrember Cox. <br /> <br />Case #2: Request For Conditional Use Permit To Construct A~ Advertisina <br />Sign: Case Of Mr. Timothv Shav: <br /> <br />Ms. wrris stated that Mr. Shay is requesting to construct an advertising <br />sign on his vacant property at 6745 l38th Avenue N.W.; there is currently <br />a sign existing on the property. Planning and Zoning recormnended denial of <br />the request a,'1d suggested Mr. Shay cha'1ge the ad copy on the existing sign. <br /> <br />Mctior. by Councilnenber Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />adopt Findings of Fact 0198, Q~ded as follows, relating to Mr. Timothy <br />Dtlayl s request for a conditional use F€rmit: (Please refer to findings of <br />"O,~ct :il' e ':=or ;:'.; na~i nee:: o~ ;:'a~ 0' 08 ) <br />~~ ~ _ . _.~ _.._ _. vw ~~. <br /> <br />.h5:5 Iter. ~20 to read: lTnat t."'1e subject to be advertised on the sign <br />Viill not be the p:::-incipal activity on t."'1e site.' <br /> <br />!vlotio:1 ca.!'ried. <br /> <br />Votina Yes: Mavo!' Reimann, COQ~cilme~bers Sorteberg, <br />. City Council/~~rch 22, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 7 of 17 <br /> <br />6S <br />