Laserfiche WebLink
<br />."") <br /> <br />they are able to acquire insurance for a private railroad crossing at <br />Dayton Port. The cost for the insurance is high and Nortb Fork is concerned <br />that the City will be able to accomplish a pUblic crossing at Dayton Port <br />in the near future. Mr. Hartley stated that he informed North Fork that <br />it is the City's policy to continue to pursue Dayton Port as a public <br />crossing and witb tbe greatest of success. it will take at least one year. <br />North Fork will be coming to the City for an amendment to tbeir conditional <br />use permit to reflect tbe new traffic route utilizing tbe private crossing <br />at Dayton Port. <br /> <br />Ca.se 112: Consider Rescbedu1 inV December 22. 1 987 Re~ular City Counc il <br />Meetin~ : <br /> <br />Council consensus was tbat tbe next regular City Council meeting will be on <br />the regularly scheduled 4tb Tuesday. December 22. 1987. <br /> <br />Case i113: Status Of Certificate Of Need For Anoka Landfill: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that he has received written notice from Metro Council <br />indicating tbat Waste Management of Minnesota. Inc. has applied for an <br />extension oftbeir certificate of need due to expire in June. 1988. Metro <br />Council staff bas indicated tbat there continues to be a need for <br />additional landfill capacity and recommends approval of tbe request for an <br />extension. Stephen K.eefe. Metro Council Cbairman. indicates that the need <br />for additional landfilling is subsiding and there may not bea need to site <br />new landfills or expand existing landfills. Mr. Hartley requested <br />direction from City Council regarding Ramsey's position on Waste <br />Management's request for an extension of their certificate of need; <br />December 16 is tbe only opportunity Ramsey will bave to make comments. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued regarding Ramsey's position on landfill issues having <br />no affect on bigher agencies in the past; cooperation on the certificate of <br />need could result in accomplisbing environmental improvements witb tbe <br />proposed vertical expansion at the Anoka Landfill. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Pearson <br />directing City Administrator David Hartley to comment on Ramsey'sbebalf <br />supporting tbe request for extension of Waste Management of Minnesota~ <br />Inc.'s certificate of need. <br /> <br />Furtber Discussion: Councilmember DeLuca stated tbat his vote to support <br />tbe request is based on bis desire to accomplish certain environmental <br />improvements with the vertical expansion being requested tbat willresul t <br />in enhancing the community; be is not responding because Metro Council bas <br />requested comments. Mr. Goodrich suggested that if Council feels their <br />comments have no impact, tbey sbould not take an official stand on tbe <br />request for extension of tbe certificate of need. <br /> <br />Councilmembers Sorteberg and Pearson witbdrew tbeir motion. <br /> <br />Motion by Coun~ilmember Pearson and seconded by Councilmember Cox to <br />register no comment regarding Waste Management of Minnesota. Inc.'s request <br />City Council/December 8, 1987 <br /> <br />. <br />i <br />? <br /> <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />