01/05/88 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'I. Plan is unacceptable to Flintwood I residents bordering the Flintwood II development. A. Reduction in property value in Flintwood I.' "Extreme reduction in my case." '1. Low cost/high density housing (row houses. very small qud homes. apartment buildings). 2. Flintwood II development incompatible with exisitng Flintwood I development (the above structures border existing urban 1 acre lots without any buffer zone or open space). 3.. Many mature trees would have to be removed.' "All trees in the case of Flintwood 5th; I have a beautiful wooded/grass yard." 'B. Loss of privacy/quality of life. 1. High population denisty on small lots immediately bordering existing Flintwood I lots without buffer. a. Population density of Flintwood I is approximately 3 people/acre.' "In Flintwood 5th. 30-50/ acre versus 2/ acre." '''!t j 'b. Population density bordering Flintwood II development would be approximately 36-50 people/acre. not counting the apartments. 2. Commercial and apartment property butting up against existing Flintwood I lots. a. Parking lots bordering Flintwood I lots. b. Increase in noise. strange people and general loss of sereneity, as well as unpleasant view.' "In Flintwood 5th, add iteI:l (c) yard lights eliminating nightime darkness." '3. Many residents would feel compelled to move out.' "I may move out." 'C. The planned development would cause a drainage problem or cause unnecessary drain pipe expense and loss of woods. 1. Half of FlintwoodI,is now drained naturally by a ditch for free.' P & Z/Public Hearing/December 1, 1987 P ag e 2 of 6 ~~..~ t.<;; t;