My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 11/14/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:54:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 7:48:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/14/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lots. These townhomes will be in a $350,000 price range. The neighborhood behind this has <br />smaller houses with smaller acreage. Almost all the houses behind Superbowl are smaller, older <br />ramblers. Across the street from that there are nicer houses that are newer that go down to the <br />corner. Directly across the street from this site there are stakes for a subdivision. <br />Councilmember Cook stated he sees no reason not to allow this developer to put in townhome <br />units at this price point. He does not ever see this site being used for a commercial site; it is not <br />accessible for any retail type of use; it would need to be an office type of use. If this use is not <br />changed to medium density residential it will sit for a long time and be useless to anyone. Also, <br />there is the conflict of the parking lot next door and the agent • storage site that is almost <br />across the street. <br />• <br />Councilmember Pearson concurred. He stated <br />good transition by Superbowl. This is not an i <br />some type of conflict, but in his opinion the to <br />Councilmember Jeffrey indicated he does not disa <br />would be concerned about six units on the site. <br />units being reduced to four. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Elvig and Councilmember <br />Mr. Dan Murphy, DPM Investments, s <br />this site, and were hoping to do two 4- <br />and trying to work with the nei <br />everyone. Mr. Murphy stated ' <br />land cost would typically be <br />homes would have worked. <br />build a minimum of six <br />this land that four units wo <br />His opinio make <br />to appr <br />impa <br />ed <br />Mr. <br />1 <br />looking for a higher density on <br />this after the first discussion <br />d proposal was a win/win for <br />k at the assessments and what the <br />ught = ��ily residences or a couple of twin <br />er doing a c was determined they would need to <br />es not thing e` • y with the assessments that are owed on <br />ffective for the type of townhomes they will be building. <br />ition. He would hope the Council could see its way <br />the attractiveness of the units will have a huge <br />as the ®.mg. There will also be decorative fencing on the <br />can transit into a nice looking small development that fits <br />itions into the neighborhood well. The lot next to this will <br />e townhomes will not look out of place with. He suggested <br />e Council with a better feel for what is planned with the <br />Ica <br />51 <br />ncurred. <br />it <br />Councilmen - bout the price point for the townhomes. <br />Mr. Murphy replies are planned at about $285,000. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Elvig inquired whey the buildings are pulled forward with the large area of land <br />behind them. <br />City Council Work Session / October 10, 2006 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />townhomes would be a <br />will ways stir up <br />omes may Ma . • od fit, but he <br />nsideration of the number of <br />-185- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.