07/23/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

3. '!hat the applicant IS proparty is Lot ~, Block 1 High Point Second Addi tion and is located in the R-l Residential District. . 4. '!hat the subj ect proparty is approximately nine acres in size. 5. '!hat the appl icant 's re::(uest is to construct a 30' ~ 56' accessory structure before the princip:il structure is constructed. 6. '!hat the City Code states that no acces~ry structures ~,be constructed on a site until the princip:il structure has been constructed on the site. 7. '!bat there are no exceptional, unique or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the proparty in question as to the intended use of the proparty that do.J:l()tc1ppl,y ~nerally to other proparties in the same zoning district. .. - '. 8. '!hat such variance is not necessary for the preservation and-enjoyment of a substantial proparty right sim.ilar to that p:>ssessed k:!i other proparties in the same distJ;ict and in the same vicinity. '!be p:>ssibility of increased financial return shall not ih itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a variance. . 9. '!hat the authorization of such variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent proparty and will materially impair the intent or purp:>se of this ordinance or the public interest. 10. '!hat the condition or situation of the subject proparty, or the intended use of the proparty for which the variance is sought, is of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation. 11. '!hat the variance will not observe the spirit and intent of the ordinance, may produce substantial injustice and will be contrary to the public interest. 12. '!hat the size of the prop:>sed structure is in excess of that parmitted ~ City Ordinance and has been shown no unique hardship which would allow for the granting of a variance to the size. f.t>tion ~ Councilmanber Reimann and seconded ~ Mayor Heitman to adopt Findings of Fact 0113, as amended, regarding Mr. Stanley CZech's re::(uest for a variance to construct an accessory structure prior to the construction of the princip:il structure. (Please refer to findings of fact file for Findings of Fact 0113). Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairparson Schlueter, Mayor Heitman, Councilmanbers Sorteberg, Cox and Reimann. Voting No: None. Motion ~ Councilmanber Reimann and seconded ~ Mayor Heitman to disawrOl7e the re::(uest k:!i Mr. Stanley CZech for a variance to construct an accessory strucblitt.e prior to the construction of the princip:il structure based on the findings of fact. . July 23, 1985 Page 4 of 7