Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'Lukerman: For lo,ad bearing, for the specific buildings, for wet-lands, if there were any on the site, that would require mental assistance. And, certainly, it would be mandatory if tion of building with an on site system rather than sewer. the presence of the ~ some more detailed environ- there was any considera- . Oliphant: One question was raised regarding failure or inability of the school district to connect the school to a sewer. Is it your judgement that a commercial development close to, would increase what may already be a serious problem. Lukerman: G~M*t*hear her responce Albert: A serious problem is the what 1 'What is the serious problem that can be increased? CANNOT HEAR RESPONCE. Albert: How about 75 dwelling units on septic tanks in the same area? Lukerman: I'm not sure that I understand your question. Albert: Instead of the shopping center, if we had 75 residential developments in roughly the same area using septic tanks. Wouldn't that also increase the problem? Lukerman: If it is significantly less than a million square feet of commercial plus the... INTK'i.RUPTION. . . Albert: You don't know now if there is going to be a million square feet. Lukerman: No, all I was trying to do was to try and explain to the council...INTERRUPTION... . Albert: In regard to soil boring. You know, don't you, before we are going to get a building permit, or money from the financer, or anybody else that we have got to have soil borings that show adequacy to support. So that all of these things have to be done by the developer. In order for him to proceed. The things that you are talking about soil borings, making sure he I s not on 1.Jet lands, making sure he's got adequate ground. So? Lukerman: Correct. Oliphant: Is it your judgement that this is a highly speculative adventure? Albert: I'm objecting to everything, but you know to ask somebody if this speculative. enossing the street is speculative. I'll stipulate that it is speculated. I'll invite you to participate in the investment, and then you'll see how speculated it is. Cox: li~. Chainnan, I heard him ask for a professional opinion. I'd like to know who..... Oliphant: Do you have a question, Mr. Coxf Cox; Yes, I would like to know who is the professional that you stated has the pro- fessional opinion? Oliphant: The professional op~lon from this witness. As to whether or not in her judgement, this is a speculative adventure by the develaper..........Can she answer that? She can answer that. I consider it a very premature and highly confusing and in that sense...... , Albert: Then, may I ask, do you know what the word speculative means? Lukerman: There are several definitions....