My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
1970's
>
1978 (Disc 20)
>
Correspondence
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2025 1:29:43 PM
Creation date
11/15/2006 9:35:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'I' <br /> <br />;J~ <br />Oliphant: Two weeks. 14 days. <br /> <br />@?) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Goodrich: Is it the intention of the Board to have this a responsive type situation or <br />should all~articipants read their briefs at the same time, and a dicision be based on <br />that? <br /> <br />Cox: What kind of briefs do we have to submit? <br /> <br />Goodrich: Well, we are not submitting. The two parties are contesting. I believe it <br />would be 45 day~question and the they avisability or jurisdiction of this board. It <br />would be the two questions. Does that agree with you, Mr. Albert? <br /> <br />Albert: Yes. It is. But, one exception, that I think that the City is a party of <br />this issue, is it not? <br /> <br />Goodrich: It is, but the appeal isn't being made to the Board. <br /> <br />Albert: That's right, but isn't the City considering filing a memorandum? <br /> <br />Goodrich: No. <br /> <br />Oliphant: I would like to have an opportunity to have the memorandum in about five <br />days before its submitted to the Board, Mr. Albert. So that I can respond. <br /> <br />Goodrich: Vice-versa. <br /> <br />Albert: If we arE!- going to be submitting memorandums back and forth, I am sure thc.t we <br />can both file within a certain period of time. They'll give us opportunites to respond. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Gorham: <br /> <br />I would think that that would be the reasonablist thing to do. <br /> <br />Goodrich: I think that it is reasonable that both parties have an opportunity to <br />respond to each other's brief. <br /> <br />~i <br /> <br />Gorham: And to both file their memorandums within the 14 days? CAN'T HEAR..... <br />I guess the list then of the documents that have to be received, if anyone has any <br />additions to this, are the minutes to phe public hearings of January 29, a letter ~~~---- <br />to the mayor of Ramsey and Council, the letter from Erling Johnson, the letter to the <br />Attorney General from both Bill Goodrich regarding Gorham's conflict of interest, <br />answer from the Attorney General in letter form, April 14ths minutes from the Council <br />meeting, Decemeber 9, 1974, special meeting of the Ramsey planning and~oning, sewer <br />progress report dated June, 1974, comprehensive sewer plan of Ramsey, metro sewer document, <br />dated February 15, 1975, letter from the municipal Commission dated Sept. 6, 1974, letter <br />to James Peterson from the Metropolitan Council dated Nov. 9, 1973, Municipal Commission <br />report will be received thru Attorney Goodrich, the ? report dated March, 1975, <br />and the petition against rezoning. <br /> <br />11 <br />11 <br />'I <br />!1 <br />i" <br />'1 <br />I. <br />I.J <br />i"I!,. <br />i:' <br />tr <br /> <br />1: <br /> <br />: ~ <br /> <br />, ~ <br />:-1 <br /> <br />J' <br /> <br />~ 1 <br />]1 <br /> <br />Oliphant: Is this a copy of the plan itself? <br /> <br />Gorham: Yes. <br /> <br />Reimann: 14 days would make it May 29, Thursday. <br /> <br />Goodrich: But, we wouldn't meet that day. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.