Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. F. That the purpose of the rezoning of the land involved in this action was to create a regional commercial shopping center designed to attract the residents of Andover, Anoka, and St. Francis which would become the hub for all activity north of Anoka. G. That there has not been a substantial change in the demography of the areas since the acceptance of the comprehensive plan. H. That the creation of the development of a comprehensive plan was brought about at least in part in 1973 in order to obtain city status and the plan was submitted as Ramsey's future plan for develop- ment to various state officials in support of its efforts to obtain city status. . I. That since the adoption of the comprehensive plan by the city there have been no efforts made on the part of the city to modify, update, or otherwise revise the plan. J. That no study was made by the city to determine the impact the . establishment of a regional commercial shopping center would have on the comprehensive plan. K. That no studies were made to determine the need for a regional commercial shopping center in the rezoned land. L. That no evidence was introduced at the public hearing showing that there had been a substantial change in the population density or the character of the land and neighborhood involved. M. That no studies were conducted or evidence introduced at the public hearing which show the possible water, air, Eewer, and traffic pollution problems which may be created by the rezoning action. N. That the rezoning of this property did not in any manner further the comprehensive plan for the City of Ramsey; and further, that the rezoning is in fact "spot" rezoning. o. That no evidence was introduced showing that there was a mistake . in the original zoning of the area involved in this action.