Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />on the resulting parcels; his taxes on his 20 acres are $413, the taxes on the <br />adjacent 40 acres are $120 and the taxes on the other 20 acres are $302. <br /> <br />Mr. Wirz stated that the green acres designation was ranoved fran the two 20 <br />acre parcels. <br /> <br />Mr. stritesky stated that he was informed ~ the County that green acres <br />cannot be carried over when property is sold; that the new property owners <br />must reapply for green acres; all three parcels were sold at about the same <br />time and all three must have missed the deadline for green acre applications. <br /> <br />Mr. wirz stated that Mr. Stritesky's valuation and taxes are higher because <br />his 20 acre parcel contains the one acre building site where the old hanestead <br />once stood prior to it's ranoval. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Stritesky irxluired as to how he could be assessed for a building site if <br />that site was vacant of buildings and could have been used as tillable landi <br />he also noted that he was given a new house number for the home he is <br />currently building on the property which must iIrply that the old building site <br />no longer exists. <br /> <br />Mr. Wirz stated that he doesn't know wtw Mr. Stritesky was given a different <br />house mEber and added that he did lower the land value fran $26,000 to <br />$23 ,500 and assessed the bane at 75% completed. Mr. Wirz added that at the <br />time of subdivision, the County sets the valuation of the properties. <br /> <br />Councilmanber Reimann stated that maybe be Mr. Stritesky should be approaching <br />the County. <br /> <br />Mr. Wirz stated that the County can't do anything about last year's valuation <br />which is when the subdivision occurred. <br /> <br />Mr. Starkey stated that this year's board of review is to discuss 1985 <br />property valuations for taxes payable in 1986; Mr. Stritesky's case refers to <br />1984 property valuations and nothing can be done about that now. Mr. Starkey <br />referred to the discussion on green acres and stated that when green acres <br />property is sold to anyone, other than a relative, it is restored for 3 years <br />payback. On the property in question, the two 20 acre parcels had their deed <br />filed prior to October 15 which resulted in the loss of the green acres <br />designation and restoration; the deed for the 40 acre parcel was not recorded <br />until after October 15 and will get restoration this year. Mr. Starkey stated <br />that the r~uiranents for green acres designation are as follows: hanestead, <br />own property for 7 years, show a farm income of $300/year plus $lO/tillable <br />acre, first year's application must be filed prior to May l. <br /> <br />Mr. Stritesky in;Iuired as to wtw his taxes are higher than the other 20 acre <br />parcel that was restored at the same time as his. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmanber Reimann replied that the difference is caused ~ the fact that <br />Mr. Stritesky's parcel contains the building site. <br /> <br />Mr. Stritesky stated that there was a 3 year period where the land was vacant <br />of buildings and was designated green acres; how could it have been green <br />May 13, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />