04/24/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. . . Mr. Fountain stated that on Septanber 10, 1984 COuncil aoopted a negative findings of fact, (aoopted in resolution form on Septanber 25, 1984), regarding Waste Management's pro};X>sal for expansion and one of those negative findings aoopted was: 'Detrimental effect on pro~rty values in the near vicinity of the landfill.' Mr. Fountain quoted Itan U5 fran that findings of fact: 'Mr. Robert Boblett, an appraiser, was retained by the City for the pur};X>se of advising the City on whether the pro};X>sed expansion would affect pro~rty values in the vicinity of the landfill. Mr. Boblett testified that the expansion to the south would cause a decrease in pro~rty values of sane adjacent pro~rties of fran 15 to 25 ~rcent. He further testified that the pro};X>sed expansion to the north would render several houses unsaleable. These houses, which are on Gamet street, include sane of the most valuable houses in the area. The pro};X>sed landfill expansion would be detrimental to ~rsons residing or working in the vicinity of the landfill and to the public welfare and would substantially i.Jntair the use, enjoyment and value of adjacent pro~rties. This finding is based on noise, o<brs and air pollution, visual im:r:acts and };X>tential for pollution, as described in other findings herein.' Mr. Fountain then referred to an article published in the August 31, 1984 issue of the Anoka Union which discussed real estate values and the inability to sell hanes in the area. The article stated that area real estate agents feel the reason for SlCM developnent in Ramsey is because Ramsey is the site of Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. The article stated that an Edina real estate agent that lives in Ramsey stated that things were good in Ramsey 3 years ago; when she bought her heme it had been on the market for 3 weeks; the hane has again been on the market since April, 1984 and she feels the reason it is not selling is because of the landfill -- ~ople oon't want to live in a tCMn knCMn for it's dump. Mr. Fountain stated that the article also states that the average market time is 55 days and in Ramsey it is 175 days and it has to be a good deal, in the price range of $55,00-$66,000 to sell. Mr. Fountain then referred to an article published in the April 11, 1985 issue of the Minnea};X>lis Tribune which states that the valuation of 42 hanes in Lake Elmo have plummeted because of contaminated water in the wells and these hanes are in the vicinity of the former Lake Jane landfill. Mr. Fountain stated that it has been determined that the landfill is contaminating ground water in Ramsey. Mr. Fountain stated that his heme is 1200' north of the present landfill boundary and he is quite certain he would not be able to sell his hane for the appraised value because the contamination situation is a well knCMn fact. Mr. Fountain stated that he believes his hane and valuation are overstated and have been for 2 to 3 years. People in the area have had their hane on the market for 2 years and have oocumented proof that };X>tential buyers site the landfill as a reason for not buying. Mr. Fountain ra:;Iuested that the valuation of his pro~rty be reduced to reflect the true value. Mr. Fountain sul:mitted to COuncil, letters fran pro~rty CMners in the vicinity of the landfill who were unable to attend tonight's Board of Review. COuncil noted receiving letters fran the fOllCMing: April 24, 1985 Page 2 of 7