Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Greenberg, Commissioners Muller, <br />Fults and Ippel. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Vevea, Kurak, <br />Gorecki, Hardin and Wagner. <br /> <br />Case #2: Discussion Regarding Highw~ #10 Corridor stuqy: <br /> <br />COmmissioner Ippel noted that this case is on the agenda as a result of <br />comments made at the March 9, 1988 EDC meeting by Commissioner Hardin and <br />stated that the case should be tabled until such time as Commissioner <br />Hardin is present to participate in the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. James Martin was present and submitted his written comments regarding <br />the Hwy. #10 Corridor Study as it relates to his 101 acres in the southwest <br />quadrant of Hwy. #10 and Traprock Street (see Attachment I to these <br />minutes). A brief discussion ensued regarding Mr. Martin's concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ippel stated that discussion of the Hwy. #10 Study should be a <br />high priority item on the April 13 EDC agenda. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued again with Mr. James Martin regarding the need for long <br />range transportation planning. <br /> <br />ADJOORNMENl' <br /> <br />It was the consensus of those present to adjourn at 9:10 a.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Sylvia Frolik <br />Secretary <br /> <br />~iY~ <br /> <br />COmmunity Developnent Director <br /> <br />Econanic Developnent Canmission/March 30, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />