Laserfiche WebLink
Since 1990, the City has been attempting to provide improved services to a dramatically increasing <br />number of households in a time of fiscal constraints at the state level. From the 1990 census to the 2003 <br />projection, Ramsey's population has increased by 68 %. At the same time, aids from the State of <br />Minnesota have decreased at the rate of 40 %. The consumer price index, as one measure of the normal <br />cost of doing business without any population growth, has increased in excess of 20% over the same <br />period. As a result, the City has struggled to maintain and improve services while keeping property taxes <br />at reasonable levels. <br />The property tax rate (expressed as a percentage of tax capacity) between 1990 and 2003 has increased. <br />In 1990, the local tax rate (city only) was 15.193 %. In 2003, it was 39.353% and 2004 is projected to <br />decrease to a tax rate of 37.437 %. While the tax rate is in fact higher than five years ago, the portion of <br />the tax dollar paid to the City is about 37¢ for every dollar collected. The other 63¢ is paid to Anoka <br />County, the School District (either Anoka- Hennepin District No. 11 or Elk River District No. 728), and <br />special taxing districts such as the Metropolitan Council. <br />The year 2003 was characterized by continued construction activity with a higher emphasis on residential <br />development. The City Council, volunteer commissions, and municipal employees strive to provide <br />services, at the levels desired by the public, at reasonable costs. <br />GENERAL OPERATIONS <br />MAJOR INITIATIVES <br />Ramsey has a long history of fiscal conservatism when it comes to the general operations of the City. <br />Using the 2003 estimate of 20,800 residents and 6,613 households, the City levied $235.80 per capita and <br />$741.68 per household in taxes for 2003. The City's staffing level is similarly conservative at 3.65 full - <br />time equivalent positions per thousand residents. All three of these measures are below the average in <br />the metropolitan area. <br />One way the City maintains a low staff -to- citizen ratio is to use temporary part-time employees, <br />volunteers, and contract services. In order to attract and maintain qualified employees, the City has <br />adopted a compensation policy with the goal of paying salaries at the median of market rates. City <br />employees are represented by two labor unions and benefit packages are negotiated through them. <br />The City is committed to continuous improvement of customer service. Investments in technology make <br />it easier and faster to retrieve information and respond to citizen requests. That investment is reinforced <br />by employee training. A recent review revealed that 85% of the City's regular employees received some <br />type of training during 2003. About 1.1% of the City's 2003 operating budget was earmarked for <br />training. <br />Emphasis over the past four years has been placed on ensuring that this community is on firm financial <br />footing. This goal has been addressed by diversification of its tax base evidenced by the growth of the <br />commercial and industrial sectors of the City. The City Council has also worked hard to ensure stability <br />in the Public Improvement Revolving Fund, Public Facilities Construction Fund, and Park Improvement <br />Revolving Funds. Fully capitalizing these funds ensures that programs such as park construction, <br />equipment replacement, and street maintenance do not require tax dollars to support city efforts. In all <br />three cases, city expenditures are supported from interest earnings from these funds within which the <br />principal balances are secure. <br />vi <br />