Laserfiche WebLink
Haviland Fields EAW Comments: <br />• In what ways will stoiiuwater management facilities be designed to reduce the risks of <br />flooding? <br />• Currently the EAW shows that no trees will be planted, however, wouldn't the City of <br />Ramsey require a certain number of trees to be replanted at a minimum? If so, how many <br />trees would that be? <br />• The EAW indicates that a comprehensive plan amendment, as well as various other <br />applications, would be applied for if needed. Isn't the applicant or the City of Ramsey <br />aware of what applications are needed at this time? Since a site plan has already been <br />submitted for review along with the application for business assistance it seems like the <br />City of Ramsey and the applicant should have at least some idea of what permits are <br />required for the project, such as a comprehensive plan amendment, and that information <br />should have been included within the EAW. <br />• Section 14.C. states that there will be minimal tree removal, however, the EAW indicates <br />that 7.37 acres of wooded/forested acres will be removed constituting over half of the <br />trees on the site. How is this minimal tree removal? <br />• Section 18.b.ii indicates that the project will develop a travel demand management plan <br />to reduce use of single occupancy motor vehicles, and increase walking, bicycling, and <br />transit as primary modes of travel to reduce GHG emissions from mobile sources. How <br />will this be developed, given the limited transit in the community and limited suitable <br />weather to bike and walk? The EAW itself states that no transit facilities are within 1 mile <br />of the project, so is the project proposing to create their own transit network and <br />facilities? Say, to link their project with the nearest MetroTransit bus stop or train station <br />via their own private bus service? <br />• Is the plan for the residential areas to utilize the church parking lot? <br />• CSAH 5 & Iodine St level of service starts at E in the PM for existing year 2023 but then <br />goes to A in opening year no build and D in opening year 2027. The text does not indicate <br />any changes to this intersection, so if the project isn't built how would the level of service <br />improve from E to A as the traffic analysis suggests? <br />• On page 7, the EAW states that based on the "land surface temperate" at the project site <br />during a heatwave in 2016 the site is susceptible to extreme heat. Won't removal of <br />59.4% of the tree canopy and no additional plantings contribute to the urban heat island <br />effect and/or make the site a less desirable place to live? <br />• There are lots of conflicting statements throughout the EAW that indicate that natural <br />resources will be preserved, however in reality the majority of natural resources are going <br />to be impacted and/or removed as part of the project. <br />• On page 9 the EAW indicates that a "Residential New Townhouse Unit" as a type of <br />application. What is a "Residential New Townhome Unit Application"? <br />