Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Delay the project for a period until the fund balance more closely matches the cost of the <br />project. <br />3. Reconsider alternate outlets for the Business Park 95 regional pond which were evaluated <br />in 2000. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson indicated after considerable discussion the consensus of the <br />Committee was to direct staff to delay the project for a period until the fund balance more <br />closely matches the cost of the project, and to direct staff to infonn Mr. Hickman of the <br />Committee's position to not proceed with the easement purchase on his property. Mr. Olson <br />advised, since the Committee meeting, staff has talked to Mr. Hickman. He has asked that the <br />City purchase the easement over a specified length oftime. This does provide some flexibility in <br />purchasing the easement, but still makes the project unachievable with the amount of money that <br />is being collected. Staffs intention is to continue to negotiate with Mr. Hickman, but if direction <br />is received from the Council as to the importance of the easement purchase in the short tenn the <br />negotiations would be delayed until there are more funds available. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if the suggestion of Mr. Hickman to purchase the easement over a <br />specified length of time would result in less cost to the City in the long run. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson replied there may be more cost involved, as Mr. Hickman will <br />likely want to receive interest. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Public Works Committee in Case No.4 and to direct staff to delay the <br />project for a period until the fund balance more closely matches the cost of the project. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Cook, Jeffrey, Olson, <br />Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />5) Discuss Modifications of Priority Street Lighting Policy <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson explained under the City's current street lighting policy, priority <br />street lights are to be located at intersections of all County and State trunk highways, as well as <br />the City's higher speed MSA streets. The City began the installation of priority lights during the <br />mid 90s and budgeted $25,000 each year for the installation of additional lights until all <br />intersections eligible for priority lights had them in place. This goal was accomplished in 2006. <br />In addition, the City has received requests for street lights in other locations that appear to have a <br />high need for street lighting. Mr. Olson advised the recommendation of the Committee was to <br />maintain a budget of $15,000 for additional priority street lights and that staff be directed to <br />modify the existing street lighting policy to include criteria for additional friority street lights, <br />and that staff be directed to place a streetlight at the intersection of 142n Avenue and Waco <br />Street. Mr. Olson explained this location is at the entrance near the park where there is a <br />significant amount of traffic. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Public Works Committee in Case No.5 and to authorize that a budget be <br /> <br />City Council/October 10,2006 <br />Page 12 of 15 <br /> <br />P22 <br />