My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Public Hearings (2)
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Community/Regional Input
>
Public Hearings
>
Public Hearings (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2007 9:15:44 AM
Creation date
12/5/2006 3:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.~, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4) Mixed Use Area Near Armstrong Blvd. The Planning Commission had no <br />particular recommendation regarding these comments. <br />. Against the mixed use area around Armstrong Blvd. <br />. Likes mixed use area for new downtown <br />. Likes mixed use area around Armstrong <br /> <br />5) Parks/Trails/Rivers/Environment The Planning Commission had no particular <br />recommendation regarding these comments. <br />. More trails needed <br />. Existing wetlands and water should be protected <br />. Plan does a good job promoting parks, river, and recreation areas. <br />. Traprock Park needs to be better maintained or redeveloped. <br />. Likes the focus on trails, parks, and preserving nature. <br /> <br />6) Density Transition The Planning Commission had no particular <br />recommendation regarding these comments. <br />. Density Transition should be in place. <br />. Density Transitioning needs to be spelled out clearly in the Comp Plan <br /> <br />7) Commuter Rail Station The Planning Commission had no particular <br />recommendation regarding these comments. <br />. Need a commuter rail station <br />. Supportive of train station <br />. Likes idea of train station <br /> <br />8) Central Planning Area The Planning Commission discussed this issue was <br />informed about recent City Council language regarding the Central Planning <br />area. The Planning Commission decided to make no comment regarding the <br />Central Planning Area since the City Council was dealing with the issue directly. <br />. Concern about Central Planning Area <br /> <br />9) General Comments The Planning Commission had no particular <br />recommendation regarding these comments. <br />. Too much emphasis on development <br />. Individual property rights should be paramount over a developer's profit <br />margm. <br />. Low Density Residential should be 2 units per acre and have no townhomes. <br />. Residents need protection from mandatory sewer hookup <br />. Concern about proposed location of 16ih through existing subdivisions. <br />. The poll identifying issues Ramsey had too small of a sample. Everyone <br />should have been polled. <br />. Feels commercial along Hwy. 10 <br />. Feels land use plan will lead to congestion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.