Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOTES <br />THURSDAY, JANUARY 25, 2001 <br />SUMMARY OF DENSITY TRANSITION ORDINANCE DISCUSSION <br />• The density transition ordinance should be applicable to the entire city, not just property within the <br />MUSA and existing large lot development adjacent to the MUSA line. <br />• The proposed transition overlay district should be eliminated; it is too restricting and doesn't allow <br />the flexibility to apply transitioning to scenarios not anticipated during the drafting of the ordinance. <br />The applicability of transitioning to a development proposal will be determined on a case by case <br />basis. <br />• Number of eligible units should be determined on net developable acres. At a minimum, net shall not <br />include wetlands (fyi: the comp plan draft states that net is minus wetlands and major roadways). <br />• Obtain a legal opinion on the idea of adopting a transition ordinance establishing the ground rules for <br />density transitioning and a policy describing various techniques for achieving transition. Does <br />referencing the policy in the transition ordinance make it just as binding as if it were in the <br />ordinances; how easily can it be amended or even abolished. <br />Staff Direction 1. Obtain legal opinion of ordinance /policy concept. <br />2. Draft an ordinance establishing transition groundrules. <br />3. Draft a transition techniques policy. <br />SUMMARY OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISCUSSION <br />• Regarding the January 2001 Draft Future Land Use Map, make the following changes: <br />1. The area of the two non - conforming homes in the northwest quadrant of CSAH 116 and <br />Ramsey Blvd. should go back to urban/rural residential transition as shown in the <br />12/21/99 draft land use map. <br />2. The property in the northeast quadrant of Ramsey Blvd and CSAH 116 should go back to <br />urban/rural residential transition as shown in the 12/21/99 draft land use map. <br />3. The amount of medium density residential shown on the Kurak property should be <br />decreased somewhat. <br />4. The parcels on the north side of 153r Avenue, east and west of T.H. #47, should go back <br />to commercial. <br />5. Replace /recapture industrial uses between Ramsey and Armstrong Blvds. Hendriksen <br />was in favor of putting that area all back to industrial and putting the mixed use and rail <br />station west of Armstrong Blvd. in line with the CSAH #116 extension and Mississippi <br />River Bridge corridor. Jerry Zimmerman called Frolik on Friday morning with a couple <br />of points of clarification and stated that he feels there is a sufficient amount of acreage <br />between Ramsey and Armstrong Blvds. to accommodate mixed use /station area and <br />places to work could be retained adjacent to Armstrong Blvd. on the east. <br />6. The westernmost 2005 MUSA boundary should go at least to Armstrong Blvd., not just <br />shy of it. One of Zimmerman's comments Friday a.m. to Frolik is that if it will help <br />housing projections, extend the 2005 MUSA boundary west to include the Bauer <br />property. (That won't help housing projections because they were calculated out to 2015; <br />however, it may be advantageous to amend the staging plan to show the 2000 -2010 <br />MUSA boundary out to the western limits of the City north of #10; and 2010 to 2015 <br />south of #10. <br />7. Put reference to charter requirement for density transitioning back in the text. <br />8. Make sure the 12/21/99 Comp Plan Draft and September 2000 amendments is in the <br />computer and has not been altered by the January 2001 draft version. (Done) <br />