My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001 Correspondence
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
>
2001 Correspondence
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2014 1:00:13 PM
Creation date
12/7/2006 7:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P PRESENTATION <br />Metro • olitan Council Meetin of: Marc 28 2001 <br />ADVISORY <br />INFORMATION <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />District(s), Member(s): <br />Policy /Legal Reference: <br />Staff Prepared/Presented: <br />Agenda Item: 2001 -54 <br />March 21, 2001 <br />City of Ramsey Comprehensive Plan Update Referral No. 18160 -1 and <br />Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor/MNRRA (Critical Area, Mississippi <br />National River and Recreation Area) — Referral File No. 16891 -1 <br />Metropolitan Council District 9, Natalie Haas Steffen, Metropolitan Council <br />MN Statutes 473.864, Subd. 2 and 473.175, Subd. 1; Critical Areas Act MN <br />Statutes 116G, Executive Order 79 -19 and PL 100 -696 <br />Sandra Pinel, Sector Representative, Principal Reviewer (651- 602 - 1513); <br />Kristin. Smitten, River Corridor Planner (651- 602 -1535) <br />Eli Cooper, Director, Planning and Growth Management (651 602 - 1521) <br />Caren Dewar, Director, Community Development 651- 602 -1306 <br />Community Development Division/Planning & Growth Management Dept. <br />Division/Department: <br />Proposed Action/Motion <br />That the Metropolitan Council adopt the attached Review Record and recommendation. <br />Issue(s) <br />• Should the Metropolitan Council permit the city of Ramsey to put its 2020 Comprehensive Plan <br />Update into effect? <br />• Should the Metropolitan Council find the plan's land use element and staging plan consistent with the <br />Regional Blueprint and Regional Growth Strategy policies for the urban reserve and permanent rural <br />area? <br />• Should the Metropolitan Council find that the plan constitutes a departure from the Metropolitan <br />Water Resources Management Plan? <br />• Should the Metropolitan Council recommend to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that the <br />Mississippi River Critical Area Corridor/MNRRA plan is consistent with regional objectives and state <br />Critical Area standards as defined by Executive Order 79 -19? <br />• Should the Metropolitan Council recommend to the National Park Service findings of Mississippi <br />River Critical Area CorridorfMNRRA plan voluntary conformance with the Mississippi National <br />River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) Comprehensive Management Plan? <br />Overview and Funding <br />The city of Ramsey, located in northwestern Anoka County along the Mississippi River, ranks 21s` of <br />communities expected to take additional growth to 2020 (4,100 more households). The southern portion <br />of this city of 29 square miles has been on urban services for a decade. The Regional Blueprint shows <br />urban, 2020 MUSA, urban reserve and permanent rural within the city of Ramsey. The predominant <br />development pattern is otherwise 1 to 2.5 -acre lots served by 3,750 on -site systems. Commercial and <br />industrial development and future urban expansion is primarily along the TH10 corridor that includes the <br />proposed Northstar Commuter rail. The plan identifies a 100 -acre mixed -use area and policies for a <br />Town Centre where achieve mixed -use and transit oriented development could be developed along the <br />Northstar corridor and TH 10. The plan proposes to add 1,096 acres to the MUSA. In areas not planned <br />for urban services where rural subdivisions have already occurred, the city proposes to increase allowed <br />density from one unit per ten acres to one unit per 2.5 acres, while keeping remaining open areas at one <br />unit per 10 acres, consistent with Council policy. <br />The city's initial submittal identified a 2015 urban growth boundary while allowing rural development in <br />what the Council identified as urban reserve. With September 2000 amendments reducing density, the <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.