Laserfiche WebLink
previously endorsed local plans that held land at densities of one unit per ten acres with ghost platting, clustering <br />and other development controls. In the city of Blaine, the Council allowed the city to put its plan into effect <br />with the exception of the Blaine Lochness Area where the city and Council are working together to develop a <br />plan for this part of the "urban reserve" that accommodates urban growth, rural lifestyles and natural resource <br />restoration. The Ramsey plan is consistent with these approaches, one per ten, ghost platting and a feasibility <br />study. As part of the study, the city should re- examine rural area policy #8 that states no sewer expansion can <br />occur unless there is a threat to public health. <br />As documented in the wastewater system review below, the final plan, as submitted, reduces the potential <br />substantial plan departure from 2020 to 2040 in that it provides opportunities for future sewered development. It <br />is unlikely, however, that the city can use all the approximately 3,500 SAC units of reserved 2020 to 2040 sewer <br />capacity within or outside the proposed study area due to existing development patterns. Should the Council <br />permit the remaining approximately 5,900 acres (1,726 vacant acres) of proposed "rural developing" go into <br />effect? Are there other areas that could eventually be provided with urban services? Contiguous MUSA <br />expansion would be difficult due to existing development. Sewer interceptor capacity could be used within the <br />TH 10 — Northstar Corridor staged area over the next 40 years if development intensifies along that corridor, <br />consistent with the Council's Transit Plan and new focus on Smart Growth within nodes and corridors. There is <br />vacant land and almost 700 acres of industrial land in that corridor that may not develop in the next 20 years. In <br />short, the city may be able to use the sewer capacity and still continue its proposed rural development. <br />However, the Council and city should identify any remaining lands where sewer could be feasible in the city <br />before zoning is changed to allow one unit per 2.5 acres in the remainder. <br />Permanent Rural <br />The Regional Growth Strategy identifies lands north of Trott Brook in the city of Ramsey as "permanent rural ", <br />to be developed at a density of one unit per 10 acres, where feasible, or through clustering to protect natural <br />resources. Agricultural and other rural uses are also recognized. In the Ramsey plan, approximately 60% of the <br />area north of Trott Brook was designated as "permanent rural" where densities of one unit per 10 acres would be <br />maintained, consistent with Council permanent rural policies. The remaining acres bordering Elk River and <br />Andover/Burns Township were designated as rural developing, previously described as one unit per 2.5 acres. <br />The city's proposed rural districts should address the following aspects of the Council's rural policy to be found <br />consistent: 1) be located outside the urban reserve 2) be retained at one unit per ten acres density where feasible, <br />and 3) where not feasible, be guided by all environmental standards for siting on -site systems and be clustered to <br />protect natural resources. The first standard was addressed to the best of the city's ability by the identification <br />of the Central Planning Area. The second standard is met for most areas, but there are approximately nine <br />quarter sections near Trott Brook that appear to be areas that could be retained at one unit per ten, including the <br />approximately 340 developable acres (800 total) removed from that classification in the March 14, 2001, <br />revisions. The initial plan review report found a departure from the Regional Water Resources Management <br />plan due to the potential failure of unmonitored on -site waste disposals systems and the possible future need to <br />expand regional sewer services to protect groundwater. The city substantially met the third standard with its <br />plan policies to protect natural resources and greenways and its recent adoption of an adequate ISTS <br />management program and ordinance. The city is still developing its surface water management plan in order to <br />protect water quality. When that plan is completed, it may be possible to increase densities while protecting the <br />rural area. <br />The city's policies for the "rural preserve" and parts of the "rural developing" areas are generally consistent with <br />the Regional Blueprint policies for the permanent rural area. However, The March 14, 2001, revised plan <br />reduced the total acres in the rural preserve from approximately 1,900 to 1,100 acres to (782 developable) acres. <br />The current housing estimate to 2020 is 741 new units on on -site systems. The city should increase the size of <br />the "rural preserve" to include remaining unplatted and contiguous parcels. Rather than increasing allowed <br />densities in these areas, clustering policies could be adopted to preserve rural character by providing a density <br />bonus to landowners and developers that protect open space and natural resources. Before implementing the <br />"rural developing" area, the city should also work with the Council and property owners to identify and reserve <br />12 <br />