Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />From: <br />To: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Frolik <br />Norman <br />6/29/00 6:52PM <br />6-29 Comp Plan Discussion <br /> <br />For your convenience, I thought I would e-mail you the results of the Comprehensive Plan discussion at <br />the 6-29 Council work session. Three out of 5 of the councilmembers wish to lower the densities in <br />Tabble V-6 on page V-32 as follows: Medium Density - 4; High Density -6. This should result in a total net <br />development of about 3.12 units per acre. Have Mark Koegler verify these numbers. <br /> <br />Staff thoughts: Isn't the Metro Council established goal 3 units per gross acre. If we reduce our densities <br />to a net 3 units per acre, then our gross will be less than 3 units per acre and fall way short of Metro <br />Council goals. <br /> <br />Report back to Terry Hendriksen with Mark Koeglers confirmation of results of lowering projected <br />densities. <br /> <br />Also, request a simple statement to be added somewhere in the text of the Comp Plan that states that the <br />total number of units allowed on a parcel of land is subject to the established densities, in conjuction with <br />all other applicable performances. I don't know if we want to go on to say that application of these other <br />performance standards may result in a density that is something less than the published maximum. <br /> <br />Place this item on the July 11 council agenda for formal action. <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />Frolik <br />