My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2006
>
Agenda - Council - 12/12/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:56:53 PM
Creation date
12/8/2006 3:45:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/12/2006
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Victory Motors <br />• Ramsey General Rental <br />Recommendation: <br />The violations that are occurring on these 1, <br />implemented regulations. In fact, the paving <br />requirement since the late 1980's and has been is <br />that time. Salvage operations have never been a <br />storage is only allowed in a very limited area aloe <br />In the past, enforcement had generally been do <br />availability and also to be consistent with enforces <br />found that enforcement actions as a result of co: <br />because a business would point to other business <br />others were forced to do the same. This series of <br />enforcement attempts. <br />Further complicating enforcement of these regul <br />lawful non -conforming with regard to surfacing r <br />unfair or uneven application of the regulations. Tl <br />be to adopt a sunset clause that would specificall <br />would need to comply with the surfacing require <br />surfacing requirement was clarified in 1993, <br />compliance date; however, that was never actec <br />amend the Code to eliminate that sunset clause. <br />The fact remains that there are current standards <br />responsible for enforcing these regulations. If <br />subsequent impact on businesses, rather than <br />enforcement, these portions of the Code shou <br />considerations regarding this matter and it ma <br />session for further discussion and review of pc <br />resolved, Council may want to give some consi <br />license in 2007 for these businesses. <br />Council Action: <br />Based on discussion. <br />Review Checklist: <br />Community Development Director <br />Asst. Com Dev Dir/HRA Exec Dir <br />Associate Planners <br />CC: 12/12/06 <br />—140— <br />• Brake Alert • <br />are not the result of "new" or recently <br />f display and/or parking areas has been a <br />.uded as part of the review of site plans since <br />rmitted use in the highway corridor. Outdoor <br />Highway 10. <br />on a complaint basis, mostly due to staff <br />it policies in the residential areas. Staff had <br />aints have been extremely difficult simply <br />and state that they would comply once the <br />pections is largely a result of these previous <br />ions is that some properties are viewed as <br />[uirements. This can give the appearance of <br />only way to eliminate this perception would <br />identify a date by which time all businesses <br />ents. This had been in City Code when the <br />th a date in 1997 being specified as the <br />upon and ultimately, Staff was directed to <br />-cif in City Code and we, as City Staff, are <br />;re are concerns about the standards and the <br />ntinue to "look the other way" in terms of <br />be revisited and revised. There are many <br />warrant placing the topic on a future work <br />ible options. Until these matters have been <br />ration to some type of limited or provisional <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.