Laserfiche WebLink
ARCADIA OSBORN, et al. v. CLEAR CHANNEL, et al. <br />Opinion of the Court <br />Harvey Shulman, Phoenix <br />Plaintiff/Appellant <br />Osborn Maledon PA, Phoenix <br />By Eric M. Fraser, Hayleigh S. Crawford <br />Counsel for Defendant/Appellee Clear Channel Outdoor LLC <br />Burch & Cracchiolo <br />By Andrew Abraham, Daryl Manhart <br />Counsel for Defendant/Appellee J & R Holdings VI LLC <br />Phoenix City Attorney's Office <br />By Paul M. Li <br />Counsel for Defendant/Appellee City of Phoenix <br />League of Arizona Cities and Towns <br />By Nancy Davidson <br />Counsel for Amicus Curiae League of AZ Cities <br />Bowman and Brooke LLP, Phoenix <br />By Amanda E. Heitz, Kendra L. Cobb <br />Counsel for Amicus Curiae Out of Home Advertising <br />OPINION <br />Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the opinion of the Court, in which <br />Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz and Judge Daniel J. Kiley joined. <br />MORSE,Judge: <br />¶Z The City of Phoenix Board of Adjustment ("Board") granted <br />five use permits and a variance to allow Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC <br />("Clear Channel") to relocate three billboards onto the facade of a newly <br />planned building and to convert two of the billboards from static to digital. <br />Harvey Shulman, Neal Haddad, Tabitha Myers, (collectively "Individual <br />Plaintiffs") and Arcadia Osborn Neighborhood Association ("AONA") filed <br />this petition for special action in superior court claiming that the Board <br />acted in excess of its statutory authority and that the relocation and <br />2 <br />