My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/14/2025
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2025
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/14/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2025 3:10:58 PM
Creation date
11/17/2025 12:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
08/14/2025
Supplemental fields
Year
%(Da
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Ealain; Commissioners Bennett, Barten, Anderson, Arts, and <br />Olson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Sis. <br />5. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />5.01: Resident Request to Remove Neighborhood Trail Connection <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood presented background information on the <br />development of the subdivisions in the area of discussion, as well as the creation of trails in that <br />area. He explained that originally, there was a road connection planned between the two <br />subdivisions, but it was decided to use a trail connection instead. He stated that the current <br />property owner purchased the property in 2021 and approached the City this year to request that <br />the trail be removed from public use. <br />Jeff Lamert, 7494 150 Lane NW, stated that they moved into their home in August of 2021 and <br />found it odd that the trail segment did not connect to another trail or sidewalk, and also did not <br />provide connection to a park. He stated that the surrounding neighbors also find the trail to be <br />odd, as do the residents on Traprock, and would prefer it to be removed. He stated that if they had <br />known what they know now, they would not have chosen to purchase their property. He stated <br />that they do support a good trail system within the community, but this trail does not provide a <br />connection to anything other than a dead-end cul-de-sac. He noted that he could only find one <br />other trail segment that is similar in nature. He commented that he has tracked usage of the trail <br />over the past four weeks, and it averages use by four groups of people per day, often times people <br />walk to the other side and then immediately return as they realize it goes nowhere. He stated that <br />he has also seen go-karts and e-bikes using the trail and going onto his yard. He stated that he has <br />spoken with both the fire and police, and they have said they do not need the trail for public safety <br />purposes. He stated that in lieu of this trail, they could extend the trail on Variolite to connect the <br />two trail systems. He stated that the two neighborhoods are already connected by the bike path <br />and asked the Commission to consider removing the trail which runs between his and his <br />neighbor's properties. <br />Rocky and Jessica Belmonte, 7514 159th Lane NW, commented that they are present for the same <br />reason. He stated that their sprinklers have been found to be located on their neighbor's property. <br />He stated that if the trail were put in as a comprise to a road that residents did not want, that would <br />seem to be a silly reason for a trail. He commented that the trail is wide enough for cars, and there <br />have been vehicles that have driven across at times before the signs were installed. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood explained that the trail was not created as a <br />compromise, but more to provide a connection between the neighborhoods. He stated that while <br />the bike path is only one -fifth of a mile from this trail for this neighborhood, if the trail did not <br />exist, it would be about six times that length for residents of Traprock to get to the boardwalk. He <br />stated that the trail was in place prior to any of the homes being built; therefore, everyone <br />purchased their homes knowing the location of the trails. <br />Mr. Belmonte stated that the sprinkler system existed prior to his purchase of the home and asked <br />if a permit is pulled for the installation of a sprinkler system. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/ July 10, 2025 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.