Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/14/2025

Home

Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that a permit is supposed to be pulled for an irrigation system to ensure there is not a cross connection. He stated that there really is no harm in having the sprinklers next to the trail, whether it is in the trail/easement, but that is done at the risk of the homeowner. He commented that the trail easement is 20 feet, as shown in the information for this case. He noted that many of the lots in this neighborhood as very small. He commented that a community garden is being considered for Traprock Commons, and the trail would make that space more accessible for residents of this neighborhood. Mr. Lamert noted that residents would still have access between neighborhoods from the trail on Variolite. Commissioner Barten referenced the statement that a trail of this nature serves no purpose and stated that he does not agree with that statement. He stated that short trails like this, especially in communities that lack a robust trail system, can serve an important purpose to allow for a greater perception of safety. He stated that Variolite receives more traffic each year. He commented that he has used this trail many times because it provides a calmer alternative to Variolite. He believed that trails of this nature serve an important purpose in providing a safe connection between neighborhoods. Mr. Belmonte stated that while he appreciates that there is a connection to Traprock, which is a quiet neighborhood, it is not as nice for the people who live there. He believed the better alternative would be to extend the Variolite trail. He asked how he would research something like this, noting that he never would have purchased the home if he knew there would be a road there. Parks and Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood clarified that the road was originally proposed, but the trail was constructed in its place —and a street connection is not being proposed. Mr. Belmonte commented that there is already a very long trail on Variolite, and it would make more sense to extend that trail rather than redirect traffic between two homes. He acknowledged that he would have nothing to gain if the trail comes out, as he would lose part of his lot due to where the property line is. Commissioner Bennett appreciated the input of the residents. He recognized that this is a tough scenario caused by a community that has been built. He stated that he understands the point of view from City staff as well, that it would not make sense to remove it at this time. He stated that as the quality of the trail deteriorates, perhaps it could be reevaluated at that point. Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood estimated that the cost for the trail to extend to Alpine would be about $500,000 or more, and other areas in the community have a greater need for new trail connections. He commented that the trails along Variolite were paid for by the developer as part of the development. Commissioner Arts asked if there are any known developments anticipated in that area along Variolite. Park and Recreation Commission/ July 10, 2025 Page 3 of 6