Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Cauncilmember Olsan stated this develapmyllt has peen dl$cussed alat and the develaper has <br />came a lang way in fallawing the suggestians the Capncil has made. She believes this is the best <br />use far this piece af praperty, and it is a nice develapment. It daes nat fit the current zaning, and <br />she daes nat knaw what cauld be put there that wauld nat be disruptive to. the neighbarhaad. <br /> <br />Acting Mayar Elvig cancurred. He natedsingle family hames against Super Bawl appears <br />awkward, and there daes nat appear to. be an interest ~ cammercial develapment in this lacatian. <br />The develaper has backed dawn fram eig~t to. six011its, and there is a pasitive with the <br />develapment being assaciatian run. He e~pressed poncern regarding the architecture and the <br />impartance ef reflecting the high end in the architecture. He suggested staggering the buildings <br />sa they do. net appear as a wall. <br /> <br />Cauncilmember Caak cancurred with CauncihnembqrOlsan an~ Acting Mayar Elvig. He stated <br />the ather thing to. paint aut is that what put thispron>erty ina difficult situatian was the request <br />far sewer and water and the impravements to the road. This praperty was paar far cammercial <br />use, and after bringing in the impravementsand assessments it became even harder to. develap <br />the site cammercially. This site is better as a residential piece af praperty, rather than <br />cammercial, and will be better as a PUD andmulti-family develepment, rather than two. single <br />family lats up against Super Bewl. <br /> <br />Cauncilmember Strommen cammented this is a difficult property. She daes nat have a strang <br />apinian against changing the zaning to. Medhun Den$ity,butthis is eften suggested as a salutien <br />when they do. nat knaw haw to. zane a pieceQfpre~erty. She agrees with Acting Mayar Elvig <br />regarding the problems in relatian to. architecture. FIer cancern is the large expanse across the <br />front. <br /> <br />Cammunity Develepment Directar Trudgean.explained this is a preliminary plat and preliminary <br />site plan review. During the fmal plat and final site plan review the Co.uncil will be able to. vate <br />up ar dawn based an the changes as lang astheCauncil cantinues to. nate what they wauld like <br />to. see changed. <br /> <br />Cauncilmember Pearsan stated he cancurs Wi. .....th what.... has..... be.en said. A site like this is kind af a <br />., '.' .,. -.... :. <br />problem no. matter haw it is dane. In his apinian thi$prepa~.al is the best fit and he weuld be in <br />favor af rezaning it and making the Cemprehensive Rlan>amendment. <br /> <br />Cauncilmember Jeffrey stated he struggles with this site. He agrees the best use far the site is <br />nat likely Places to. Shap; they do. net knew what tha! result wauld be in that neighbarhaad. It is <br />nated in the minutes that he has said he wauldli1ce tqsee faur units instead af six. The six units <br />create a wall, and he struggles with the arc1,itecturaI piece of that. He wauld nat necessarily <br />want that in his neighbarhead. He wauld liie to. ca,tinue to. press far faur units instead af six. <br />The use needs to. be residential, but nat with the laak.and feel afthe praperty the way it has been <br />presented. <br /> <br />Acting Mayar Elvig requested clarificatien that the 'Cauncil will have plenty af input into. the <br />architecture as this develapment praceeds. <br /> <br />City Councm1a~o'Vem1~er 14,.2006 <br />Pa~llof~1 . <br /> <br /> <br />P19 <br />