My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 05/24/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2005
>
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 05/24/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 1:21:21 PM
Creation date
1/15/2026 1:20:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
05/24/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Members Elvig, Steffen, Kiefer, LeTourneau, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Gromberg. <br /> <br />Case #1: Municipal Center Bonds <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley noted included in the EDA's packet is a memo from Member Gromberg reiterating some of his points in opposition to these bonds. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund explained the action before the EDA is the actual bond sale for the Municipal Center. The Council will consider the actual final adoption tonight. If the Council <br /> does not agree to this project the sale of the bonds will not go through. <br /> <br />Paul Donna of Northland Securities explained with the adoption of the proposed resolution the EDA will be authorizing the execution and delivery of a ground lease agreement and a lease <br /> agreement between the EDA and the City of Ramsey, and an Indenture of Trust between the EDA and US Bank who will be acting as Trustee of all bond proceeds. The documents have been <br /> prepared and reviewed by Briggs and Morgan, the City's Bond Council. He reviewed the following information with the EDA: ground lease agreement, lease agreement, Indenture of Trust, <br /> debt service schedule, net debt service schedule, pricing summary, operation of project construction fund, and detail costs of issuance. <br /> <br />Member Elvig inquired about the effect of the bond rating being at A2 rather than A1. Mr. Donna replied the effect is minimal. The A ratings are at A1, A2, and A3, and typically there <br /> will be some A1’s and A2’s traded right on top of each other. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked if capital improvement bonds would be at an A1 rating. Mr. Donna responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Member Elvig questioned if the added cost of G.O. bonds versus lease revenue bonds has been minimized due to the lower rate. Mr. Donna replied the G.O. bonds will always cost a little <br /> more, due to the fact that it is a more risky transaction for the investor. However, the City has done the best it can to mitigate the risk by having the bonds insured. <br /> <br />Member Elvig stated the capitalized interest is an important factor. The Council and staff worked hard to project the tax rates the City will have. There was a tax spike in the first <br /> couple of years, which came down considerably in the future. To prevent the tax spike there were mechanisms put in place to draw extra funds and capitalized interest in to bring the <br /> tax capacity rate down to where it has been the last couple of years. By doing this the tax rate will not be increased. <br /> <br />Chairperson Riley asked if there are additional bonds being discussed at the Council meeting tonight. Finance Officer Lund replied there will be G.O. bonds issued for the county's portion <br /> of the AUAR road costs. The county's debt service payments will pay back that bond as it comes due each year.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.