My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/08/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2007
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/08/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:26:31 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 1:55:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
01/08/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairperson McDilda stated that having photos with every sample would be overkill, but <br />photos could provide a point of reference in talking about the measures in value. <br /> <br />Ms. Kampbell stated that all the photos are in JPG format so they are the property of the <br />City of Ramsey already. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated that the photos belong to the city and they can be available on a <br />DVD. <br /> <br />Environmental Specialist Bacon asked if the layers could be electronically available. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated that it would be in GIS form. <br /> <br />Board Member Sibilski asked how many wetlands were upgraded or downgraded after <br />the initial assessment. <br /> <br />Ms. Kampbell stated that she could provide a comparison. <br /> <br />Board Member Sibilski asked how one small section along the river could change from <br />Preserve to Manage 1. He noted his long term concern that someday that property <br />might be sold. He stated that he would rather see it as Preserve than Manage 1 along the <br />rIver. <br /> <br />Ms. Kampbell explained that the river was split up into sections. She stated the first <br />priority for Bowser that puts the wetland into exception is the vegetation. She stated she <br />would clarify that in the report. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated the reason for the change could be because the area along <br />the Mississippi River abuts agricultural land. <br /> <br />Environmental Specialist Bacon asked what the MLCCS categories relate to. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated that assuming they were accurate, they would relate to diversity. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda stated that the primary areas to address in the report would be any <br />time something came back as unavailable and why that is; and, any time there is a sharp <br />transition or deviation from predictions. <br /> <br />Board Member Bentz asked if since the city paid for this, there was a way to get credits <br />submitted to government agencies. He asked if this could be used to apply for matching <br />grants or funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated that it belongs to the city and can be used however they want to use <br />it. <br /> <br />Board Member Bentz asked if this data could potentially be of use to the State of <br />Minnesota or the Corp of Engineers. <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board! December 4, 2006 <br />Page 10 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.