My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/16/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2007
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/16/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:46:03 PM
Creation date
1/16/2007 11:34:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
01/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />C. Firm Experience: The proposer shall identify a minimum of three projects that your firm has <br />completed within the last five years of a similar scope and a reference shall be included for each <br />project, including contact name and telephone number. The proposer shall outline the firm's <br />experience in the Upper Midwest as it relates to the requirements ofthis project. <br /> <br />D. Work Schedule: The proposer shall prepare a work task flow chart which illustrates <br />, chronologically the firm's intent to reach major milestones and products within the time-frame <br />contained in the Request for Proposals. <br /> <br />E. Project Team: A list of personnel who will be assigned to this project must be provided in the <br />submittal. Personnel experience and qualifications as they relate to this study as well as what role <br />each will perform on this project shall be also be includ~d. <br /> <br />F. Work Proeram and Hourlv Estimate: The proposer shall prepare a work program that outlines <br />the task that will be completed (and when) and indicate which team member(s) will be performing <br />. each task. An estimate of the personnel hours (by employee classification) for each work task <br />identified shall be prepared. A detailed listing of hourly rates for each employee classification used <br />by the firm shall be provided. The work program shall also indicate the level of Ramsey <br />participation in the project as well as any other service anticipated to be provided by Ramsey. <br /> <br />G. Current Workload: A discussion of the firm's current workload is to be provided, as well as <br />those of the project team and sub-consultants identified as they may relate to this study. Include a <br />description of any conflicting projects or studies of which the City should be aware. <br /> <br />H. Consultant Fee: An hourly cost for consulting services including reimbursable mileage, <br />meetings, etc. associated with this project is to be submitted with the proposal. The actual fee shall <br />be based on actual hours involved at the rates set forth in the proposal and include a not-to-exceed <br />total cost figure. <br /> <br />I. Summary: The proposer shall summarize the key elements of the proposal and provide a <br />discussion as to why your firm should be selected for this study. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />III. EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF THE ENGINEERING FIRM <br /> <br />A selection committee comprised of City personnel will evaluate the proposals. Members of the <br />selection committee will review and rate each proposal based on the following criteria: <br /> <br />A. Project Understandine: The firm's understanding oftheproject and the concerns of the City as <br />evidenced in the Proj ect Understanding. <br /> <br />B. Project Approach: Clarity, innovativeness, conciseness, organization, and the overall <br />responsiveness to the RFP.. <br /> <br />C. Project Personnel: The assignment of qualified and experienced engineering staffresponsible <br />for the project who have proven their ability to work together as a team on similar projects. <br />Minnesota registration is required. <br /> <br />D. Work Pro2:ram: Thoroughness of the proposed work program, including personnel assignments <br />by employee classification (and estimated time needed for each task) and timeline benchmarks for <br />completion of milestones of report. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.