Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Erica Sitz, 6521 154th Lane NW, stated the 1997 through 2001 Comprehensive Plan was <br />developed with extensive public hearings. The area they are talking about was 2 ~ acre lots, <br />which came out of that plan. She wants to be sure there is openness for what will happen there. <br />When the cluster ordinance was first passed she was at that first hearing, and whoever presented <br />from staff's basic statement was that 2 ~ acre lots were bad so they want to change. Ms. Sitz <br />stated she wants to be sure the option for 2 Y2 acre lots is still on the table. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler replied her understanding from what she has heard from Council is <br />that there is a lot of openness to many different options in ea, from cluster to 1 to 2 ~ <br />acre lots, and larger acre lots. <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Sitz questioned if a certain amount of publi <br />Plan update. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />d as a means of trying to preserve <br />eloped land to accommodate <br />e cluster ordinance did not go <br />n 2 ~ to 1 in 10. He clarified with <br />n 1 house in 2 Y2 acres, but it was <br />stering is mandatory and it has been <br /> <br />e cluster ordinance was talked about in terms of <br />etting . Tiger Meadows was mentioned, and he thinks <br />n to it and they preferred it would have been clustered. Mr. <br />oof that 2 ~ acres are excellent; it preserves the rural feeling <br />ave said is why they came here. Later on there will be a <br />disc s with the greenspace concept. People can have their own <br />buffer 2 ~ acres. If there are areas where that exists, and it is later <br />filled in wi you have neighborhoods and sub-communities with a variation. <br />However, if it an density entirely you have a vast feel of urban density, which is <br />not planning to hi ould like to see people have some options while the debate is going <br />on. Family circumstan might require development of some kind and they will be stuck with 4 <br />in 40. He knows the Planning Commission would listen to any individual proposal; <br />circumstances could force people into a distressed situation where they might have to sell and <br />they would be facing 4 in 40. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 21 of 36 <br /> <br />-262- <br />